Decriminalization Debate Postponed On Latin America
A raíz de la tolerancia al consumo de drogas en América Latina y la ambigüedad legal que lo rodea, gobiernos, partidos políticos y principalmente organizaciones sociales, consideran que es el momento indicado para que los Estados inicien la discusión que podría llevar a la despenalización del consumo de, al menos, algunas de esas drogas.
No obstante, ningún país de la región está discutiendo oficialmente el tema. Todo indica que la despenalización –incluso de la marihuana, cuyos efectos sociales y personales son los más aceptados– va a demorar.
No es que falten promotores poderosos: al menos tres de los intelectuales continent's most important believe that decriminalization would be the most effective way to end the harmful use and gangsterism of the business.
Nobel Prize in Literature, Mario Vargas Llosa, is in favor of decriminalization and indicates that the drug cartels and have won the war because of the existing ban.
In Mexico, the magazine Nexos adopted its position in its editorial of October, in favor of decriminalization, and figures such as former Foreign Minister Jorge Castaneda has been ruled to legalize marijuana as an alternative to a failed war against drug trafficking currently facing the Mexican government.
Former President Brazil's Fernando Henrique Cardoso argues in the same direction.
The reality is different ... But one thing are the speculations of thinkers and another reality: in many countries neither politicians nor the public get to see the priority of the item in saturated agendas of social conflicts of a more palpable urgency.
In Brazil itself, whose stereotype of carefree fun and has a worldwide reputation, a 2008 survey conducted by Data Folha revealed that one of every five Brazilians supports the decriminalization of drugs and that 76% prefer that smoking marijuana is prohibited law.
More or less the same figures are given in Peru. A recent study by the Center Information and Education for the Prevention of Drug Abuse (Cedar), indicates that nine out of 10 Peruvians are against legalization.
Chilean society also has low approval ratings for the legalization of marijuana, ranging from 25% in the general population to 32% in schoolchildren.
Perhaps that is why Peru and Chile is where least envisions a national debate on the subject.
In Peru, according to official counts, there are about 100,000 cannabis users. One of the government's argument is that "legalizing the consumption does not solve the problem because the state lacks the capacity to address the harmful consequences that its use results in people, "he summed Milton Red Cedar expert.
Mexican President Felipe Calderón, accepted the debate over legalizing drugs, but noted that among the arguments against the measure is the increase in consumption, especially among youth and adolescents, as well as generating an idea of \u200b\u200bwhat is socially acceptable.
A member of the International Narcotics Control United Nations also rejected the legalization but another of the arguments run by opponents of the idea: a policy of this nature merely encourages organizations to continue contesting markets and territories and any country where consumption has slowed applied or the operations of criminal organizations. Is often cited cases of Holland and England.
The Argentine government announced that it would proceed to legalization, but a year later did not present a project on the subject in Congress. Yes they did opposition MPs. For specialists, this is a conceptual error.
"We started backwards, instead of outlining a strategy and follow the law to see if it works or not the objectives, here we have a court order and have to adapt the goals to that decision. First you have to categorize drugs, take them out of ideological focus individual right, and only then proceed with a change of law, "said Claudio Mate, former Minister of Health of Buenos Aires.
Activism. Thus, the debate is limited to the promotion of legalization by activists to have little relevance in the areas of decision. In Uruguay, for example, some groups aim to achieve full liberalization of the use or possession of marijuana. This idea picks up support among some academics, lawyers and nuances, some politicians, including a pair of former presidents.
And although in some cities on the continent marches to legalize marijuana is common, the political class and society still perciben el tema como el exotismo juvenil en un problema mucho mayor que incluye protagonistas tan feos como delincuentes con poderes paragubernamentales e infraestructuras letales. Y esa clase de argumentos son los que pesan más, hoy, en las sociedades latinoamericanas contra la despenalización.
Informe especial GDA realizado con la participación de Daniel Gallo (La Nación, Argentina); Tatiana Farah (O Globo, Brasil); Sair Buitrago (El Tiempo, Colombia); Carlos Arguedas C. (La Nación, Costa Rica); Geovanny Tipanluisa (El Comercio, Ecuador); Silvia Otero (El Universal, México); Carolina Ciurlizza (El Comercio, Perú); Javier Ignacio Mayorca (El Nacional, Venezuela), Fabián_Muro (El País, Uruguay) and the editorial offices of El Mercurio, Chile, and El Nuevo Dia, Puerto Rico. Text editing was responsible for Fernan R. Cisneros (El Pais, Uruguay).
www.lamarihuana.com
Saturday, December 25, 2010
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
Ascii Art Mario Travian
CHARLIE HADEN QUARTET WEST - SOPHISTICATED LADIES
If this blog give grades, stars and other types of scores this album would take top honors. This "Sophisticated Ladies" is perhaps the best album was edited in 2010 . It is a luxury disk from any point of view, from its cover, so vintage, until, of course, its musical content .
The Charlie Haden Quartet West is possibly the best quartet of the last twenty years. Four musicians are imbued with an enviable way with an exquisite taste for melody and improvisational inventiveness as good as the best musicians free. Charlie Haden and his group show here once again his love for music of the forties and fifties of jazz, and how to interpret a bright, pleasant, positive and fun.
The album has six songs sung by some of the most important female voices of today, here are Melody Gardot, Norah Jones, Cassandra Wilson, Ruth Cameron, Renée Flaming and Diana Krall, and the other six are instrumentals. Boot disk "" If I'm lucky "by the Gardot and a string orchestra is to stay glued to the couch to display both beauty and the version of" Sophisticated Lady "that follows is exquisite . And so forth.
not worthwhile to extend this record, only strongly recommend it and hope you enjoy it. By the way, disc is so good that if you have any doubt about the beauty of jazz and his ability to move emotions, this album are dispelled.
José Manuel Pérez Rey
Label: Emarcy
Distributor: Universal
Year: 2010
Musicians: Charlie Haden (bass), Ernie Watts (tenor saxophone), Alan Broadbent (piano), Rodney Jones (drums), Melody Gardot, Norah Jones, Cassandra Wilson, Ruth Cameron, Renée Flaming and Diana Krall (vocals)
Style: Modern Jazz
If this blog give grades, stars and other types of scores this album would take top honors. This "Sophisticated Ladies" is perhaps the best album was edited in 2010 . It is a luxury disk from any point of view, from its cover, so vintage, until, of course, its musical content .
The Charlie Haden Quartet West is possibly the best quartet of the last twenty years. Four musicians are imbued with an enviable way with an exquisite taste for melody and improvisational inventiveness as good as the best musicians free. Charlie Haden and his group show here once again his love for music of the forties and fifties of jazz, and how to interpret a bright, pleasant, positive and fun.
The album has six songs sung by some of the most important female voices of today, here are Melody Gardot, Norah Jones, Cassandra Wilson, Ruth Cameron, Renée Flaming and Diana Krall, and the other six are instrumentals. Boot disk "" If I'm lucky "by the Gardot and a string orchestra is to stay glued to the couch to display both beauty and the version of" Sophisticated Lady "that follows is exquisite . And so forth.
not worthwhile to extend this record, only strongly recommend it and hope you enjoy it. By the way, disc is so good that if you have any doubt about the beauty of jazz and his ability to move emotions, this album are dispelled.
José Manuel Pérez Rey
Label: Emarcy
Distributor: Universal
Year: 2010
Musicians: Charlie Haden (bass), Ernie Watts (tenor saxophone), Alan Broadbent (piano), Rodney Jones (drums), Melody Gardot, Norah Jones, Cassandra Wilson, Ruth Cameron, Renée Flaming and Diana Krall (vocals)
Style: Modern Jazz
www.distritojazz.com a website dedicated to the world of jazz and other music, written in Castilian and open to the world.
Friday, December 17, 2010
How Much Does It Cost For Angel Bites
YARON HERMAN TRIO - FOLLOW THE RABBITT
Division of opinion is what has created the last work of Yaron Herman. The pianist of Israelite origin who lives in France still like in their host country and Germany, but received some 'buts' Mediterranean criticism. Europe is well. According
Yaron northern neighbors with his new trio is more spontaneity and energy getting rid of a mannerism that previously hampered his music. Some blamed him know this pianist true intellectualism misunderstood.
A strong point for this new energy that runs through the veins jarrettiana the pianist seems to emerge from the rhythmic beats new drummer Tommy Crane imposed with the help of Chris Tordini on bass, the game Yaron. Southern
Criticism Yaron's work from the pianist's music lacks sufficient soul to transcend, we who plays hard and well, perhaps too, but that does not reach the heart. In my humble opinion
Yaron Herman is a pianist who like almost everyone has their good and bad and that every step that expands horizons and improving their work, their last two recordings are really good and this time "Follow the Rabbitt "is no exception. Among the fourteen compositions
highlight the two raids in the world of pop - rock, already common in the earlier works of the pianist, one with Nirvana "Heart Shaped Box" and the other in a successful Radiohead "No Surprises" are chosen . A small remembrance of her Jewish origins with a quiet theme signed by D. Aaron "Ein Gedi" name of a beautiful oasis in Israel. It also has its place among the strongest themes Herman signature solo or trio, the ballad "Baby Mine" out of Walt Disney film "Dumbo." For variety one can complain.
I think Herman is a very good piano player in the line of the current leaders of the roost (Mheldau, Iverson, Iyer, etc ...) that deserves a quiet listening and after each draw their own conclusion.
As the disk and follow the rabbit in Alice and immerse ourselves in Wonderland jazzy proposed Yaron Herman and his people.
I. Ortega
Label: ACT
Distributor: Karonte
Year: 2010
Musicians: Yaron Herman (piano), Chris Tordini (bass), Tommy Crane (drums)
Style: Jazz Modern
Division of opinion is what has created the last work of Yaron Herman. The pianist of Israelite origin who lives in France still like in their host country and Germany, but received some 'buts' Mediterranean criticism. Europe is well. According
Yaron northern neighbors with his new trio is more spontaneity and energy getting rid of a mannerism that previously hampered his music. Some blamed him know this pianist true intellectualism misunderstood.
A strong point for this new energy that runs through the veins jarrettiana the pianist seems to emerge from the rhythmic beats new drummer Tommy Crane imposed with the help of Chris Tordini on bass, the game Yaron. Southern
Criticism Yaron's work from the pianist's music lacks sufficient soul to transcend, we who plays hard and well, perhaps too, but that does not reach the heart. In my humble opinion
Yaron Herman is a pianist who like almost everyone has their good and bad and that every step that expands horizons and improving their work, their last two recordings are really good and this time "Follow the Rabbitt "is no exception. Among the fourteen compositions
highlight the two raids in the world of pop - rock, already common in the earlier works of the pianist, one with Nirvana "Heart Shaped Box" and the other in a successful Radiohead "No Surprises" are chosen . A small remembrance of her Jewish origins with a quiet theme signed by D. Aaron "Ein Gedi" name of a beautiful oasis in Israel. It also has its place among the strongest themes Herman signature solo or trio, the ballad "Baby Mine" out of Walt Disney film "Dumbo." For variety one can complain.
I think Herman is a very good piano player in the line of the current leaders of the roost (Mheldau, Iverson, Iyer, etc ...) that deserves a quiet listening and after each draw their own conclusion.
As the disk and follow the rabbit in Alice and immerse ourselves in Wonderland jazzy proposed Yaron Herman and his people.
I. Ortega
Label: ACT
Distributor: Karonte
Year: 2010
Musicians: Yaron Herman (piano), Chris Tordini (bass), Tommy Crane (drums)
Style: Jazz Modern
www.distritojazz.com a website dedicated to the world of jazz and other music, written in Castilian and open to the world.
Tuesday, December 7, 2010
See Online Bangbros Free
Sex and Marijuana: Who Enjoy More?
When taking the cannabis to bed, he and she do not get the same pleasure, although some cannabis is just what it takes to bed.
In one of the most memorable myths of ancient Greece, Zeus and his wife Hera asked Tiresias, the famous priest who had tried both spectra of duality, being a man, then woman for seven years (to see a couple copulating snakes and beaten with a staff) and then again man which of the two sexes get more pleasure during sex? Tiresias, as an entity almost alchemical hermaphrodite, responds that most women enjoy sex, so Hera, angry, makes him blind, but Zeus gives the gift of prophecy. Similarly
might ask: Who enjoys sex more under the influence of cannabis? And the answer is also women. According to the study doctor "Male-Female Differences in the effects of cannabinoids on Sexual Behavior and gonadal hormone function" performed by the University of British Columbia, women consistently reported facilitating effects pleasure of smoking marijuana before or during sex. Also studies in nonhuman animal species show beneficial effects greater extent than debilitating effects of cannabinoids in the pro-responsiveness and receptivity of females, while males suggest detrimental effects on sexual motivation and erectile function . Inhibition of male sexual behavior is independent of "concurrent decrease testosterone levels."
Why women benefit from marijuana as sexual snack? You may have to do with marijuana is not a stimulant, psychotropic effect can be understood more as an introjection and female sexuality is in this sense implosive explosive, while male sexuality is externalized. Although this is only a symbolic interpretation and not scientific.
Another medical study shows that people who smoke marijuana have more sexual partners.
www.lamarihuana.com
When taking the cannabis to bed, he and she do not get the same pleasure, although some cannabis is just what it takes to bed.
In one of the most memorable myths of ancient Greece, Zeus and his wife Hera asked Tiresias, the famous priest who had tried both spectra of duality, being a man, then woman for seven years (to see a couple copulating snakes and beaten with a staff) and then again man which of the two sexes get more pleasure during sex? Tiresias, as an entity almost alchemical hermaphrodite, responds that most women enjoy sex, so Hera, angry, makes him blind, but Zeus gives the gift of prophecy. Similarly
might ask: Who enjoys sex more under the influence of cannabis? And the answer is also women. According to the study doctor "Male-Female Differences in the effects of cannabinoids on Sexual Behavior and gonadal hormone function" performed by the University of British Columbia, women consistently reported facilitating effects pleasure of smoking marijuana before or during sex. Also studies in nonhuman animal species show beneficial effects greater extent than debilitating effects of cannabinoids in the pro-responsiveness and receptivity of females, while males suggest detrimental effects on sexual motivation and erectile function . Inhibition of male sexual behavior is independent of "concurrent decrease testosterone levels."
Why women benefit from marijuana as sexual snack? You may have to do with marijuana is not a stimulant, psychotropic effect can be understood more as an introjection and female sexuality is in this sense implosive explosive, while male sexuality is externalized. Although this is only a symbolic interpretation and not scientific.
Another medical study shows that people who smoke marijuana have more sexual partners.
www.lamarihuana.com
What Does It Mean To Have A Posterior Cervix
Are Marijuana Smokers Really Stupid?
In many cases, smoking marijuana is associated with mental slowing and some children's behavior, but you really are stupid smokers of cannabis or simply adapt to a stereotype?
If you tend to act foolishly or clarifying aspects of life after children smoke a joint, most likely you are not stupid but unconsciously you adjust your behavior to certain cultural stereotypes in relation to this activity. Undeniably there are some biochemical effects following consumption of THC (the active ingredient in marijuana). Red eyes, cheerful attitude and a certain slowness, are part of this effect. However, the cultural translation of these effects has been drawing a clumsy personality, even stupid, some ganja smokers or English are called "potheads."
A study by Mitch Earleywine, a psychology professor at the University of Albany, and published in the journal Addictive Behaviors, found that smokers of marijuana have a willingness to act stupid like that in his unconscious "cultural" there is a strong association between consumption of grass and this pattern of behavior. Beyond the tangible effects on a person's memory, especially during the effects of THC have not really tested negative consequences cognitvo level, long-term marijuana smokers.
Earleywine and his colleagues studied 57 smokers of marijuana, 30 men and 27 women. Half were given a reading that suggested that marijuana damages the brain. In contrast, the other half received a document which states that this plant has no adverse effects within the cognitive abilities. After all participants had to take a test after at least 24 hours of not smoking cannabis. The results were surprising because in the case of men, they were significantly influenced by the type of reading that had been assigned. Encambio women showed better skills when they were faced with the stereotype and somehow struggled to break the stigma and succeeded.
This concludes, according to researchers, men are much more susceptible to bias against cultural stereotypes even adapting their conduct to them. Maybe that's why we have never seen the cliché of a marijuana smoker represented by a woman. Always are men more vulnerable to fit these stereotypes, sometimes behave as if they were stupid when they smoke marijuana, but really are not. Does it?
www.lamarihuana.com
In many cases, smoking marijuana is associated with mental slowing and some children's behavior, but you really are stupid smokers of cannabis or simply adapt to a stereotype?
If you tend to act foolishly or clarifying aspects of life after children smoke a joint, most likely you are not stupid but unconsciously you adjust your behavior to certain cultural stereotypes in relation to this activity. Undeniably there are some biochemical effects following consumption of THC (the active ingredient in marijuana). Red eyes, cheerful attitude and a certain slowness, are part of this effect. However, the cultural translation of these effects has been drawing a clumsy personality, even stupid, some ganja smokers or English are called "potheads."
A study by Mitch Earleywine, a psychology professor at the University of Albany, and published in the journal Addictive Behaviors, found that smokers of marijuana have a willingness to act stupid like that in his unconscious "cultural" there is a strong association between consumption of grass and this pattern of behavior. Beyond the tangible effects on a person's memory, especially during the effects of THC have not really tested negative consequences cognitvo level, long-term marijuana smokers.
Earleywine and his colleagues studied 57 smokers of marijuana, 30 men and 27 women. Half were given a reading that suggested that marijuana damages the brain. In contrast, the other half received a document which states that this plant has no adverse effects within the cognitive abilities. After all participants had to take a test after at least 24 hours of not smoking cannabis. The results were surprising because in the case of men, they were significantly influenced by the type of reading that had been assigned. Encambio women showed better skills when they were faced with the stereotype and somehow struggled to break the stigma and succeeded.
This concludes, according to researchers, men are much more susceptible to bias against cultural stereotypes even adapting their conduct to them. Maybe that's why we have never seen the cliché of a marijuana smoker represented by a woman. Always are men more vulnerable to fit these stereotypes, sometimes behave as if they were stupid when they smoke marijuana, but really are not. Does it?
www.lamarihuana.com
Pokemon Fire Red Strategy
prosecuted for having a marijuana plant in his house where he lives with his family
in Argentina. In theory, possession for consumption is not penalized. But the Court found that the plant had in the house where she lives with her son's grave.
A father was convicted of a marijuana plant growing inside the residence where he lives with his wife and son, judicial sources said.
The Federal Court of General Roca confirmed the prosecution and thus endorsed the court ruling.
For the maids, the man does not reach the benefit that applies to these cases if they arise in the personal or intimate, as the marijuana grown in front of his family.
therefore be "away any possibility of extending this figure, the principles by which it was understood that no offense was drug possession for personal use," said House.
www.lamarihuana.com
in Argentina. In theory, possession for consumption is not penalized. But the Court found that the plant had in the house where she lives with her son's grave.
A father was convicted of a marijuana plant growing inside the residence where he lives with his wife and son, judicial sources said.
The Federal Court of General Roca confirmed the prosecution and thus endorsed the court ruling.
For the maids, the man does not reach the benefit that applies to these cases if they arise in the personal or intimate, as the marijuana grown in front of his family.
therefore be "away any possibility of extending this figure, the principles by which it was understood that no offense was drug possession for personal use," said House.
www.lamarihuana.com
List Of Stock Symbols Yahoo
Genital was carrying marijuana, the package gave him away
Nueva Segovia all Jamaica .- The man was checking the "package" to his fellow passengers until the police told him to teach the "paquetón."
The news reads
"With a load of marijuana that weighed 192 grams, which hid in the genitals, was arrested José Ramón Cañada Third, 30, a native of Sandino neighborhood of Ocotal, while traveling morning last Wednesday in a bus from Las Manos.
agents boarded the bus to seize the suitcases of passengers, when they detected that the man had an abnormal bulge between his legs, although it is of slim build.
After being seized and they found the grass it was subjected to the field test, which tested positive for marijuana. The suspect accepted the crime, arguing that a person is delivered in Honduras as payment for a debt. "I was going to do 'business', if someone is selling it bought it," he said. "
www.lamarihuana.com
Nueva Segovia all Jamaica .- The man was checking the "package" to his fellow passengers until the police told him to teach the "paquetón."
The news reads
"With a load of marijuana that weighed 192 grams, which hid in the genitals, was arrested José Ramón Cañada Third, 30, a native of Sandino neighborhood of Ocotal, while traveling morning last Wednesday in a bus from Las Manos.
agents boarded the bus to seize the suitcases of passengers, when they detected that the man had an abnormal bulge between his legs, although it is of slim build.
After being seized and they found the grass it was subjected to the field test, which tested positive for marijuana. The suspect accepted the crime, arguing that a person is delivered in Honduras as payment for a debt. "I was going to do 'business', if someone is selling it bought it," he said. "
www.lamarihuana.com
Monday, November 8, 2010
Cookworks Xbm1129 Manual
The Nobel Vargas Llosa in Favor of 'Mary' Defeat
Mario Vargas Llosa is regretted that the State did not question the drugs like alcohol and snuff and considers a mistake not to legalize the cultivation and consumption of marijuana. It would be a good solution, says, to eradicate once the problem of drug-related crime in Mexico has only caused this year's total of 10,035 dead creepy.
In light of the recent vote in California, 57% against legalization, and 47% in favor, the author of Aunt Julia and the Scriptwriter thinks "it's time to change policy towards drugs" to fight posters, and Currie in the 20's with alcohol prohibition in the United States. The law shall deprive the drug market your business and will eventually ruin it.
Vargas Llosa is not the only voice crying in the wilderness. Another Nobel for Literature, Gabriel García Márquez, also calls for decriminalization. "One of the great benefits of marijuana as a medicine is its safety. There are no known cases of fatal overdose. "
singer Juanes has manifested itself in the same line as the Nobel and Juan Manuel Serrat confessed pot smoker. A group of fans sent him a plant.
last month Basque associations of cannabis users have requested the Parliament to regulate elcultivo Euskadi and consumption of marijuana to combat the black market. They also suggest a record of consumer associations with "legal protection and legal certainty" and come to ask for legal plantations are "protected by the Regional Police."
The only political party has called on Congress to legalize marijuana was left United in December 2007. Not obtained response.
blogs.terra.es
Mario Vargas Llosa is regretted that the State did not question the drugs like alcohol and snuff and considers a mistake not to legalize the cultivation and consumption of marijuana. It would be a good solution, says, to eradicate once the problem of drug-related crime in Mexico has only caused this year's total of 10,035 dead creepy.
In light of the recent vote in California, 57% against legalization, and 47% in favor, the author of Aunt Julia and the Scriptwriter thinks "it's time to change policy towards drugs" to fight posters, and Currie in the 20's with alcohol prohibition in the United States. The law shall deprive the drug market your business and will eventually ruin it.
Vargas Llosa is not the only voice crying in the wilderness. Another Nobel for Literature, Gabriel García Márquez, also calls for decriminalization. "One of the great benefits of marijuana as a medicine is its safety. There are no known cases of fatal overdose. "
singer Juanes has manifested itself in the same line as the Nobel and Juan Manuel Serrat confessed pot smoker. A group of fans sent him a plant.
last month Basque associations of cannabis users have requested the Parliament to regulate elcultivo Euskadi and consumption of marijuana to combat the black market. They also suggest a record of consumer associations with "legal protection and legal certainty" and come to ask for legal plantations are "protected by the Regional Police."
The only political party has called on Congress to legalize marijuana was left United in December 2007. Not obtained response.
blogs.terra.es
How Long Does Iritis Take To Heal
no boosters Stops 19, That only Start
Proposition of marijuana got more votes than
Meg Whitman "We're happy because it has attracted attention worldwide and legalize dialogue has begun, we believe it's a matter of time ... "
Proposition 19 received more votes than the candidate for governor got Meg Whitman, resulting in their drivers a sense of triumph and courage to go ahead with this battle for legalization of marijuana.
"We're happy because it has drawn wide attention world and legalize dialogue has begun, we believe it is a matter of time, let's go ahead, because they are rejecting our arguments, but were scare tactics that were used last time, "said Dale Jones, spokesman Yes On 19 Coalition.
Proposition 19 added 3,412,387 votes, while Whitman got 3,088,070.
"While Proposition 19 lost by a few points, it was a very significant victory," said Ethan Nadelmann, Drug Policy Alliance representative. "If you look at the numbers and percentages, we see that Proposition 19 received more votes than he got Meg Whitman or Carly Fiorina, that is very significant. "
According to a report from Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles Proposition 19 would have passed with 52%.
Another interesting results of the Nov. 2 vote is that 64% of young people aged between 18 and 24 years old voted in favor of Proposition 19.
"In the 2012 elections will have more Latino voters and that way we can win," said Nadelmann. "The important thing is that there has been a transformation in the dialogue, not only in California, but nationally and internationally, has increased and legitimized."
An employee of a medical marijuana dispensary located on the beach in Venice only managed to say: "My comment is that I still have work, if it had been approved, maybe my job was at risk."
Outside the site, identified as Dr. 420 Evaluation Center of Medical Marijuana, Kyle Moran lamented that failure to approve the measure.
"For drug traffickers will continue to make money for them, I voted for, but it was the decision of the people, for me it was better to be legalized, should be like alcohol, because for me the clinics are misleading," said the young.
Andrew Smith and his brother James went to another clinic in Venice called Doctor Kush and also felt that should be legalized.
"As is the marijuana will still face, we hope that next time is achieved," said Andrew.
"I regret that it has failed, it would have the opportunity to cultivate for people who need medicine, I could grow and not have to be paying illegal dealers would be like growing your own tomatoes," said James . No manager
clinics or stores that sell marijuana products qusieron offer a comment.
Opponents of Proposition 19 issued a statement with which
recalcaronn that it was a false measure that would regulate and control the resources generate proclaimed.
"No matter what position you have the voter on legalization, but acknowledged that Proposition 19 was a mess and a legal nightmare," said Tim Rosales of the coalition No On Prop 19.
www.lamarihuana.com
Proposition of marijuana got more votes than
Meg Whitman "We're happy because it has attracted attention worldwide and legalize dialogue has begun, we believe it's a matter of time ... "
Proposition 19 received more votes than the candidate for governor got Meg Whitman, resulting in their drivers a sense of triumph and courage to go ahead with this battle for legalization of marijuana.
"We're happy because it has drawn wide attention world and legalize dialogue has begun, we believe it is a matter of time, let's go ahead, because they are rejecting our arguments, but were scare tactics that were used last time, "said Dale Jones, spokesman Yes On 19 Coalition.
Proposition 19 added 3,412,387 votes, while Whitman got 3,088,070.
"While Proposition 19 lost by a few points, it was a very significant victory," said Ethan Nadelmann, Drug Policy Alliance representative. "If you look at the numbers and percentages, we see that Proposition 19 received more votes than he got Meg Whitman or Carly Fiorina, that is very significant. "
According to a report from Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles Proposition 19 would have passed with 52%.
Another interesting results of the Nov. 2 vote is that 64% of young people aged between 18 and 24 years old voted in favor of Proposition 19.
"In the 2012 elections will have more Latino voters and that way we can win," said Nadelmann. "The important thing is that there has been a transformation in the dialogue, not only in California, but nationally and internationally, has increased and legitimized."
An employee of a medical marijuana dispensary located on the beach in Venice only managed to say: "My comment is that I still have work, if it had been approved, maybe my job was at risk."
Outside the site, identified as Dr. 420 Evaluation Center of Medical Marijuana, Kyle Moran lamented that failure to approve the measure.
"For drug traffickers will continue to make money for them, I voted for, but it was the decision of the people, for me it was better to be legalized, should be like alcohol, because for me the clinics are misleading," said the young.
Andrew Smith and his brother James went to another clinic in Venice called Doctor Kush and also felt that should be legalized.
"As is the marijuana will still face, we hope that next time is achieved," said Andrew.
"I regret that it has failed, it would have the opportunity to cultivate for people who need medicine, I could grow and not have to be paying illegal dealers would be like growing your own tomatoes," said James . No manager
clinics or stores that sell marijuana products qusieron offer a comment.
Opponents of Proposition 19 issued a statement with which
recalcaronn that it was a false measure that would regulate and control the resources generate proclaimed.
"No matter what position you have the voter on legalization, but acknowledged that Proposition 19 was a mess and a legal nightmare," said Tim Rosales of the coalition No On Prop 19.
www.lamarihuana.com
Examples Of Welcome Letters To New Patients
California just said no to the privileges for marijuana
In the midterm elections 57% of the electorate vote against Proposition 19 for recreational uses of cannabis
Act to regulate and tax the consumption, possession and Production Cannabis proposed by California Assembly members voted against. 57% rejected it while 43% voted in favor.
Barack Obama's government and security agencies as the DEA were against legalization and freedoms for over 21 years for possessing, using, transporting and marketing of green grass.
What this law would allow manipulation of up to 028 grams, enough for 25 to 30 regular sized cigarettes.
Proponents claimed that the approval would generate a revenue of 400 million billion dollars a year and a generation of 50 thousand jobs. Besides arguing that the state spends a lot in pursuing and entering correctional who called juvenile offenders.
the Attorney General Eric Holder U.S. had indicated that the occurrence of a yes to the Act, the federal security mission would continue its war against drug consumption and distribution. Obama's team to contest the law.
Doubts and controversy following the rejection cleared
The state of California is a pioneer in opening doors to cannabis, as in 1996 legalized medicinal use.
www.lamarihuana.com
In the midterm elections 57% of the electorate vote against Proposition 19 for recreational uses of cannabis
Act to regulate and tax the consumption, possession and Production Cannabis proposed by California Assembly members voted against. 57% rejected it while 43% voted in favor.
Barack Obama's government and security agencies as the DEA were against legalization and freedoms for over 21 years for possessing, using, transporting and marketing of green grass.
What this law would allow manipulation of up to 028 grams, enough for 25 to 30 regular sized cigarettes.
Proponents claimed that the approval would generate a revenue of 400 million billion dollars a year and a generation of 50 thousand jobs. Besides arguing that the state spends a lot in pursuing and entering correctional who called juvenile offenders.
the Attorney General Eric Holder U.S. had indicated that the occurrence of a yes to the Act, the federal security mission would continue its war against drug consumption and distribution. Obama's team to contest the law.
Doubts and controversy following the rejection cleared
The state of California is a pioneer in opening doors to cannabis, as in 1996 legalized medicinal use.
www.lamarihuana.com
Tuesday, November 2, 2010
Sample Welcome Dentist To Dentist Letter
Holland is the only country where Marijuana is Free Sales and Consumer Sites
The sale and consumption of marijuana is already allowed in the Netherlands, one of the most liberal in the world.
However, its consumption is only allowed in special places, to be licensed by the State, which closely monitors.
consumption is regulated, which is done in coffeeshops where you can smoke and sell up to five grams per person of that drug.
But the Dutch like to mix marijuana with Snuff. For them, the 'coffeeshops' in their establishments include places reserved for such a mixture, which also shows the smoke with nicotine, which prohibits law.
But some establishments have chosen to offer a 'steamers', so that when marijuana is consumed with snuff, smoke from reaching the air and not incurred in violation of laws SMOKE.
According to a report in El Mundo, Spain, the 'spray' of marijuana, which is sold online at a price of 400 euros, is an inhaler in the lower part is heated marijuana, while the smoke emerges from this process is stored in a bag, from which the consumer wants the drug.
www.lamarihuana.com
The sale and consumption of marijuana is already allowed in the Netherlands, one of the most liberal in the world.
However, its consumption is only allowed in special places, to be licensed by the State, which closely monitors.
consumption is regulated, which is done in coffeeshops where you can smoke and sell up to five grams per person of that drug.
But the Dutch like to mix marijuana with Snuff. For them, the 'coffeeshops' in their establishments include places reserved for such a mixture, which also shows the smoke with nicotine, which prohibits law.
But some establishments have chosen to offer a 'steamers', so that when marijuana is consumed with snuff, smoke from reaching the air and not incurred in violation of laws SMOKE.
According to a report in El Mundo, Spain, the 'spray' of marijuana, which is sold online at a price of 400 euros, is an inhaler in the lower part is heated marijuana, while the smoke emerges from this process is stored in a bag, from which the consumer wants the drug.
www.lamarihuana.com
Wella Kolestone Color Chart
Special Rapporteur of the UN Urges Legalizing Marijuana
Legalizing marijuana use is the right strategy to be followed by governments to control violence, human rights violations and corruption arising drug trafficking, said today a UN expert.
'will not be easy to convince the public of the benefits of legalization of marijuana in the world, but is an issue that should be encouraged. The cost of not doing so is very high in terms of human lives, "said Anand Grover, UN special rapporteur for the right to health.
In an interview with Notimex, the expert said the possibility that the upcoming November 2, citizens of California choose to decriminalize marijuana use is "a step in the right way."
'The only people who benefit from the ban, are the criminals ", said the special rapporteur.
Grover, attorney for the Supreme Court of India, must periodically submit a report on its activities to the UN General Assembly as an independent expert to make recommendations to Member States to delineate policy.
Rapporteur's opinion is one of the different views within the UN system on the best existing way to control drugs and their negative impact on the world.
The UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), said that the drug should be pursued and strengthened law enforcement against this crime.
Grover, however, is among the UN agencies that advocate an approach that is high on the drug control strategies to respect human rights and access to health services.
The expert noted that Portugal has successfully decriminalized marijuana use, which did not entail an increase in crime rates nor in the consumption of this substance.
'Criminalization leaves no benefit to society. And it costs a lot in terms of human lives, human rights and corruption in the government, "said Grover.
The lawyer also mentioned that the prohibition of marijuana is based on criteria very questionable, that have no basis in any clear evidence of its damages.
www.lamarihuana.com
Legalizing marijuana use is the right strategy to be followed by governments to control violence, human rights violations and corruption arising drug trafficking, said today a UN expert.
'will not be easy to convince the public of the benefits of legalization of marijuana in the world, but is an issue that should be encouraged. The cost of not doing so is very high in terms of human lives, "said Anand Grover, UN special rapporteur for the right to health.
In an interview with Notimex, the expert said the possibility that the upcoming November 2, citizens of California choose to decriminalize marijuana use is "a step in the right way."
'The only people who benefit from the ban, are the criminals ", said the special rapporteur.
Grover, attorney for the Supreme Court of India, must periodically submit a report on its activities to the UN General Assembly as an independent expert to make recommendations to Member States to delineate policy.
Rapporteur's opinion is one of the different views within the UN system on the best existing way to control drugs and their negative impact on the world.
The UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), said that the drug should be pursued and strengthened law enforcement against this crime.
Grover, however, is among the UN agencies that advocate an approach that is high on the drug control strategies to respect human rights and access to health services.
The expert noted that Portugal has successfully decriminalized marijuana use, which did not entail an increase in crime rates nor in the consumption of this substance.
'Criminalization leaves no benefit to society. And it costs a lot in terms of human lives, human rights and corruption in the government, "said Grover.
The lawyer also mentioned that the prohibition of marijuana is based on criteria very questionable, that have no basis in any clear evidence of its damages.
www.lamarihuana.com
Monday, October 18, 2010
Wrestlers In Jockstraps
The 3:10 to Yuma: Closing the space
When you start a western, all envision it will be like the great epics epics of John Ford, Raoul Walsh or Howard Hawks, opening with a great view of Monument Valley or the American Desert Classic being crossed by a little diligence lost in the immensity of the monumental landscape before us. Probably, then sounds the theme of the film sung by country star of the moment and we will have to do to get such care to a small western town, with its bar, your living room (saloon for the purists) and brothel, also if a church is a people out of a Fordist ribbon. There may be variables, like, before reaching the village, the coach is attacked, either by Indians or outlaws the illegal. In the latter case, the paradigm would certainly The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance , timeless classic and masterful Ford plea for freedom, or The 3:10 to Yuma , these so-called psychological western in which we witness a tense thriller movie disguised those of western lifetime, but in which the action takes place in a short period of time, that the director dilate at will, and which avoids the wide open spaces and vistas that leverage the full potential of cinemascope providing this genus usually shelter in small houses and rooms suffocating strangle the characters framed in frenzied close-ups, going into extreme situations usually end in a cathartic end in line with all the tension. What difference, therefore, to the bright tape Delmer Daves's classic Fordist, even with a start that could be categorized as prototypical, or Rio Bravo hawksiana , with similar ingredients? Perhaps this disillusionment and cynicism that transmits the script, these characters that move money and dignity rather than kindness, and empathy relationship established between the protagonist and the criminal, and the incredible staging of the director, who provided here an exercise in style close to German Expressionism, which had already implemented brilliant authors like William Wellman in Ox-Bow Incident , probably the first hint of western psychological or mediocre Zinnemann highly valued in their incomprehensibly Noon, perhaps the best known example of this subgenre, in a thus anticipated that western twilight cause such a furor in the 60's onwards, and how far would be in classic western ideals of Ford opened diligence.
Daves dared to go one step further and removed the rough texture of the classic westerns, those bright colors and vivid images such where showy landscapes prevailed to convert the movie into an intense and virulent elegiac drama background and so dry and sparsely poetic as the grim scene in a funeral procession is the driver killed in view of the two protagonists. And is that not talking about a history of winners, is an inner journey of a loser, a coward, searching for himself to prove his courage to his family after being humiliated in front of their children by the bully more pint of member cowboy mafia that so portentous played by Glenn Ford, and to compensate his wife for so many hardships and straits. And here, the character played by a magnificent Van Heflin does not seek glory if not money, what makes him placed in a position not too far from the criminal Ben Wade. The contrast with the classical hero is remarkable, and this figure of the knight errant who stopped only the evil is removed from a stroke in the stunning sequence of detention at the beginning of the dangerous thief. Heflin did not hesitate to distract him from a dishonorable way to the sheriff at gunpoint to the back, all while asking for money for having wasted your time. It is perhaps one of the clearest advances of Tom Doniphon to assassinate by Liberty Valance back years later and it would mean the true end of western ever, the papier-mâché. Given this, the film takes us to an interesting point where Ford's character will air, if not more romantic and honorable, if it embarrasses the viewer because of the strange duality between good and evil that takes him, being a character with a somewhat questionable morality, able to kill someone but ask for that body a proper burial in his hometown. Is someone with their own rules, their own code. The brilliant play of characters between hunter and prey, the feeling of dependence, almost friendship, empathy, which is created between the two, is the engine of the entire tape, the repeated offers of arrogant Wade and Dan Evans of honest doubt, tempted by the devil in the form of cynical and charismatic murderer. Because of this relationship, the film gives us the opportunity to see a magnificent duel interpretive somewhat minimized will end with a conclusion somewhat distant and inconsistent with the pattern shown so far, making the film has its unique failure this final bright cloud the work of the writer.
But coldly analyze the major project of the story that the writer makes, since it is most important. It is true that the film has an aesthetic without it is unimaginable that photography is simply impeccable, being a basic element to tell the story, which music intimate and almost experimental arguably the time like a glove fit on the images, and the assembly is one of the basic elements that help create that feeling of being overwhelmed and suspense throughout the film, but the script what stands out, as the tape is more than just an aesthetic revolution, is the position of speech over any narrative method here broke barriers, and final results in a symbiosis between rhetoric and simply wrap amazing. Mixture of western and a thriller that at times is pure black film, we find an intense study of character rarely seen in this genre. Within of this genre film shows, there are also a powerful drama in the apparent destruction of the family consumed by debt and hunger, and jealousy, seeing Dan's wife in the character of Wade a kind of escape from their routine and mediocre life, an escape and a return to youth in a city where she was daughter of a sea captain. Through this, Wade discovers the advantages of a sedentary lifestyle, the maturation of his character comes just when the young leave Emmy in the tavern in town and test some homemade stew in the company of the Evans family, which arouses curiosity of children as if it were a fictional character. It is, therefore, a shock habits, since, as someone said, the western is the genre where you shake hands myth and reality. From here, the brilliant director's handling of the story cloisters characters in a small hotel they come when final clash between the two, which will arise loyalty and Dan must fight against itself and against its prey showing the highlights of the tape that will surface fears and loyalty will be more necessary than ever. And loyalty is precisely what will change the character motivation, consumed by doubts and loneliness in search of that role. And this is where the film fails, a climax that, if it is correct and maintains the suspense, it is somewhat tricky, somewhat dissonant with the tone and ideas of the film, ending in the shooting of commercial rigor let alone make a movie just perfect, groundbreaking in terms of plot and stylistic and maturation was a huge step for a genre that would later break that vision is what has come to today.
When you start a western, all envision it will be like the great epics epics of John Ford, Raoul Walsh or Howard Hawks, opening with a great view of Monument Valley or the American Desert Classic being crossed by a little diligence lost in the immensity of the monumental landscape before us. Probably, then sounds the theme of the film sung by country star of the moment and we will have to do to get such care to a small western town, with its bar, your living room (saloon for the purists) and brothel, also if a church is a people out of a Fordist ribbon. There may be variables, like, before reaching the village, the coach is attacked, either by Indians or outlaws the illegal. In the latter case, the paradigm would certainly The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance , timeless classic and masterful Ford plea for freedom, or The 3:10 to Yuma , these so-called psychological western in which we witness a tense thriller movie disguised those of western lifetime, but in which the action takes place in a short period of time, that the director dilate at will, and which avoids the wide open spaces and vistas that leverage the full potential of cinemascope providing this genus usually shelter in small houses and rooms suffocating strangle the characters framed in frenzied close-ups, going into extreme situations usually end in a cathartic end in line with all the tension. What difference, therefore, to the bright tape Delmer Daves's classic Fordist, even with a start that could be categorized as prototypical, or Rio Bravo hawksiana , with similar ingredients? Perhaps this disillusionment and cynicism that transmits the script, these characters that move money and dignity rather than kindness, and empathy relationship established between the protagonist and the criminal, and the incredible staging of the director, who provided here an exercise in style close to German Expressionism, which had already implemented brilliant authors like William Wellman in Ox-Bow Incident , probably the first hint of western psychological or mediocre Zinnemann highly valued in their incomprehensibly Noon, perhaps the best known example of this subgenre, in a thus anticipated that western twilight cause such a furor in the 60's onwards, and how far would be in classic western ideals of Ford opened diligence.
Daves dared to go one step further and removed the rough texture of the classic westerns, those bright colors and vivid images such where showy landscapes prevailed to convert the movie into an intense and virulent elegiac drama background and so dry and sparsely poetic as the grim scene in a funeral procession is the driver killed in view of the two protagonists. And is that not talking about a history of winners, is an inner journey of a loser, a coward, searching for himself to prove his courage to his family after being humiliated in front of their children by the bully more pint of member cowboy mafia that so portentous played by Glenn Ford, and to compensate his wife for so many hardships and straits. And here, the character played by a magnificent Van Heflin does not seek glory if not money, what makes him placed in a position not too far from the criminal Ben Wade. The contrast with the classical hero is remarkable, and this figure of the knight errant who stopped only the evil is removed from a stroke in the stunning sequence of detention at the beginning of the dangerous thief. Heflin did not hesitate to distract him from a dishonorable way to the sheriff at gunpoint to the back, all while asking for money for having wasted your time. It is perhaps one of the clearest advances of Tom Doniphon to assassinate by Liberty Valance back years later and it would mean the true end of western ever, the papier-mâché. Given this, the film takes us to an interesting point where Ford's character will air, if not more romantic and honorable, if it embarrasses the viewer because of the strange duality between good and evil that takes him, being a character with a somewhat questionable morality, able to kill someone but ask for that body a proper burial in his hometown. Is someone with their own rules, their own code. The brilliant play of characters between hunter and prey, the feeling of dependence, almost friendship, empathy, which is created between the two, is the engine of the entire tape, the repeated offers of arrogant Wade and Dan Evans of honest doubt, tempted by the devil in the form of cynical and charismatic murderer. Because of this relationship, the film gives us the opportunity to see a magnificent duel interpretive somewhat minimized will end with a conclusion somewhat distant and inconsistent with the pattern shown so far, making the film has its unique failure this final bright cloud the work of the writer.
But coldly analyze the major project of the story that the writer makes, since it is most important. It is true that the film has an aesthetic without it is unimaginable that photography is simply impeccable, being a basic element to tell the story, which music intimate and almost experimental arguably the time like a glove fit on the images, and the assembly is one of the basic elements that help create that feeling of being overwhelmed and suspense throughout the film, but the script what stands out, as the tape is more than just an aesthetic revolution, is the position of speech over any narrative method here broke barriers, and final results in a symbiosis between rhetoric and simply wrap amazing. Mixture of western and a thriller that at times is pure black film, we find an intense study of character rarely seen in this genre. Within of this genre film shows, there are also a powerful drama in the apparent destruction of the family consumed by debt and hunger, and jealousy, seeing Dan's wife in the character of Wade a kind of escape from their routine and mediocre life, an escape and a return to youth in a city where she was daughter of a sea captain. Through this, Wade discovers the advantages of a sedentary lifestyle, the maturation of his character comes just when the young leave Emmy in the tavern in town and test some homemade stew in the company of the Evans family, which arouses curiosity of children as if it were a fictional character. It is, therefore, a shock habits, since, as someone said, the western is the genre where you shake hands myth and reality. From here, the brilliant director's handling of the story cloisters characters in a small hotel they come when final clash between the two, which will arise loyalty and Dan must fight against itself and against its prey showing the highlights of the tape that will surface fears and loyalty will be more necessary than ever. And loyalty is precisely what will change the character motivation, consumed by doubts and loneliness in search of that role. And this is where the film fails, a climax that, if it is correct and maintains the suspense, it is somewhat tricky, somewhat dissonant with the tone and ideas of the film, ending in the shooting of commercial rigor let alone make a movie just perfect, groundbreaking in terms of plot and stylistic and maturation was a huge step for a genre that would later break that vision is what has come to today.
Tuesday, September 28, 2010
Sabroina Sweet Wikipedia
The Wind That Shakes the Barley: The hyperbole of a fact
Whenever I get ready to watch a movie good (insert laugh) Ken Loach, I imagine myself in a class and the teacher getting very simpaticote pinko and he starts giving us a history lesson and its strategy is to convince everyone that we take part in empirical facts on which we judge these characters without taking into account the historical context in which these events occurred, without judging the education received by those persons, or without understanding the social and lifestyle of the time. I crush your head, you point the finger and makes you wonder whether you are a good person if you support his own cause, whether just or not (I shall not evaluate this issue as we talk about history, past events) and nothing short of disrespect you if you fail in what they want. The funny thing is that British film is neither more nor less than the highest Manichaean the film industry, so blatant camouflaging its supposedly revolutionary ideas and looking for objectivity and realism from the more extreme subjectivity, and that is why Wind That Shakes the Barley pamphlet ends up being a bit ridiculous at the network level and with little to humanize the two parties to an armed conflict, in addition to the coolness with which Loach tells facts which, starting from base quite dramatically, as is the country's political conflict and fighting between friends or brothers as this happens, and please all those unable to see beyond their noses and understand the complexity of an event that dates back nearly 800 years in the past, and the impudent director here becomes a treaty of offensive partisanship ending away from the Irish nationalist question (thing absolutely legitimate and I agree that until the last point) to focus on its stale topicazo social cinema, where the wicked oppressors are wealthy landowners who support the British and good-natured film, those who have no advantage in life and struggle for a just cause is the poor lower-class Irish who exceed all the problems in carrying out his revolution and triumph over evil, and which is neither more nor less than proletarian version of Michael Collins Hollywood a few years ago made the always interesting Neil Jordan, and here has a start scene sober and somewhat inert, and if it is true that you have another great sequence, the director almost cleared and ends up being a movie without any force.
Within this alleged historicism Loach looking into the story, it makes two major errors in his narrative and structure of the film: if you want to be historical and verismo should give a broader view of certain facts, as it passes for high enough important elements of conflict, as the presence of Michael Collins and De Valera, his signing of the treaty or its virulent anti once Ireland is split into two halves, and the excessive distance that permeates the story, making it impossible to establish links between two main characters, brothers O'Donovan, and the viewer, which will be debated in his mind which of the two should support policies according to their own ideas and not because he actually cares what happens to one or the other, as , depending on height of the movie, that matters as well as the color of the eyes of Ana Botella. The script, by longtime collaborator Paul Laverty, is riddled with inconsistencies between the protagonists contradictions, especially Damian O'Donovan, a very good Cillian Murphy, a character capable of executing in cold blood a fellow murderers but then accuse protrat and unfair to do exactly the same (perhaps not realize Loach, but is a representation of his films, quite a liar and manipulator). There is a scene that adds nothing, one in which Sinead Damian tells her encounter with the boy's mother executed, and would have achieved a major result being told visually and not to the words of the protagonist, but I imagine that no Loach would like to charge for such responsibility to their cultured and refined hero character that never really came to understand its full evolution, because in just a couple of scenes we see changes from a neutral and rather cowardly blockhead, to call it somehow be the end of the most idealized patriotism, leaving Collins, the father of the Irish homeland, the height of the bitumen. And that's another matter. It is, at least, the harsh fact that the real revolutionaries, those who are right, are guided by a character study, since, in a way no rube will be able to realize the injustices committed by the British towards the Irish, and not corrupt as the evil Teddy, mix between Judas and Cain, with whom he is primed to show his iron Loach doctrine and show how much was wrong with his little brother, the intellectual of the family (although, ironically, the kid can study even though his family has no money).
The resort, well-worn, but no less effective, placing starring two brothers, is fairly predictable, and its similarity to the Irish Civil War and the vision of Paddy O'Donovan Cain is very poor. Would ever have courage if his ideas and his message were not so clean and not to demonize the British and Irish protrat to exhaustion, but when dividing the story into two parts, the play will go wrong and, in fact, maliciously, it could get support proingleses to the kitsch and the heroism of Murphy's book character, and his false view of farmers, able to drop a political tirade in the middle of a meeting of the Irish rebels where to find pros and anti treaty, and wherein the second talk consistent with reasons and arguments, while the former can hardly be justified babble and questions, irrefutable evidence to the director of his ill-advised ideas, and, moreover, is the most incredible scenes (and implausible) and boring the whole tape. Completely destroying the historical, as I said above, the portraits of the English as well as being superficial, which only will swallow the most dupes, is that of a dehumanized killing machines, the only thing they do in Ireland is to enjoy killing native and non-stop abusing them, neither more nor less than that performed in the 40's in Hollywood on Nazis, and indeed, this film has much in common with the other hand, portentous Hangmen Also Die, the (yes) master Fritz Lang. True, in the classic Austrian director had didacticism, and a clear good and bad, with that Brecht's own intellectualism that was something cold and hard to grasp by the viewer Loach likes both, but lacking the force of another, and, above all, moral debate that has been submitted to Brian Donlevy, between doing the right thing and surrender to the Nazis, while here the creation of Cillian Murphy is a hero in the Homeric sense of the word, strong and without weaknesses to fight the evil giants attacking people. And, in The Wind That Shakes the Barley not no room for debate, English destroys any attempt of reflection by the viewer and makes him swallow his message, it really dangerous to justify the fact, so quite explicit, the use of violence, leading to sympathize with the IRA, something similar to what made the cake in his allegedly inflammatory Medem The Basque Ball . There were more ideas, a priori, more interesting, such as dehumanization caused by the war on people, or the inability to mix law and war, but that does not matter at the point where they'll become the film, a parody of children looking for small to eat the head and left wing people here see the classic songs mythologized to the ridicule of a struggle based on ideals quite correct, but where the end should never justify the means and to see supported its political and sign that the festival is happening something strange and it looks all that is removing political consciences ... mine, of course, to forget, is that I am an evil mataboers
Whenever I get ready to watch a movie good (insert laugh) Ken Loach, I imagine myself in a class and the teacher getting very simpaticote pinko and he starts giving us a history lesson and its strategy is to convince everyone that we take part in empirical facts on which we judge these characters without taking into account the historical context in which these events occurred, without judging the education received by those persons, or without understanding the social and lifestyle of the time. I crush your head, you point the finger and makes you wonder whether you are a good person if you support his own cause, whether just or not (I shall not evaluate this issue as we talk about history, past events) and nothing short of disrespect you if you fail in what they want. The funny thing is that British film is neither more nor less than the highest Manichaean the film industry, so blatant camouflaging its supposedly revolutionary ideas and looking for objectivity and realism from the more extreme subjectivity, and that is why Wind That Shakes the Barley pamphlet ends up being a bit ridiculous at the network level and with little to humanize the two parties to an armed conflict, in addition to the coolness with which Loach tells facts which, starting from base quite dramatically, as is the country's political conflict and fighting between friends or brothers as this happens, and please all those unable to see beyond their noses and understand the complexity of an event that dates back nearly 800 years in the past, and the impudent director here becomes a treaty of offensive partisanship ending away from the Irish nationalist question (thing absolutely legitimate and I agree that until the last point) to focus on its stale topicazo social cinema, where the wicked oppressors are wealthy landowners who support the British and good-natured film, those who have no advantage in life and struggle for a just cause is the poor lower-class Irish who exceed all the problems in carrying out his revolution and triumph over evil, and which is neither more nor less than proletarian version of Michael Collins Hollywood a few years ago made the always interesting Neil Jordan, and here has a start scene sober and somewhat inert, and if it is true that you have another great sequence, the director almost cleared and ends up being a movie without any force.
Within this alleged historicism Loach looking into the story, it makes two major errors in his narrative and structure of the film: if you want to be historical and verismo should give a broader view of certain facts, as it passes for high enough important elements of conflict, as the presence of Michael Collins and De Valera, his signing of the treaty or its virulent anti once Ireland is split into two halves, and the excessive distance that permeates the story, making it impossible to establish links between two main characters, brothers O'Donovan, and the viewer, which will be debated in his mind which of the two should support policies according to their own ideas and not because he actually cares what happens to one or the other, as , depending on height of the movie, that matters as well as the color of the eyes of Ana Botella. The script, by longtime collaborator Paul Laverty, is riddled with inconsistencies between the protagonists contradictions, especially Damian O'Donovan, a very good Cillian Murphy, a character capable of executing in cold blood a fellow murderers but then accuse protrat and unfair to do exactly the same (perhaps not realize Loach, but is a representation of his films, quite a liar and manipulator). There is a scene that adds nothing, one in which Sinead Damian tells her encounter with the boy's mother executed, and would have achieved a major result being told visually and not to the words of the protagonist, but I imagine that no Loach would like to charge for such responsibility to their cultured and refined hero character that never really came to understand its full evolution, because in just a couple of scenes we see changes from a neutral and rather cowardly blockhead, to call it somehow be the end of the most idealized patriotism, leaving Collins, the father of the Irish homeland, the height of the bitumen. And that's another matter. It is, at least, the harsh fact that the real revolutionaries, those who are right, are guided by a character study, since, in a way no rube will be able to realize the injustices committed by the British towards the Irish, and not corrupt as the evil Teddy, mix between Judas and Cain, with whom he is primed to show his iron Loach doctrine and show how much was wrong with his little brother, the intellectual of the family (although, ironically, the kid can study even though his family has no money).
The resort, well-worn, but no less effective, placing starring two brothers, is fairly predictable, and its similarity to the Irish Civil War and the vision of Paddy O'Donovan Cain is very poor. Would ever have courage if his ideas and his message were not so clean and not to demonize the British and Irish protrat to exhaustion, but when dividing the story into two parts, the play will go wrong and, in fact, maliciously, it could get support proingleses to the kitsch and the heroism of Murphy's book character, and his false view of farmers, able to drop a political tirade in the middle of a meeting of the Irish rebels where to find pros and anti treaty, and wherein the second talk consistent with reasons and arguments, while the former can hardly be justified babble and questions, irrefutable evidence to the director of his ill-advised ideas, and, moreover, is the most incredible scenes (and implausible) and boring the whole tape. Completely destroying the historical, as I said above, the portraits of the English as well as being superficial, which only will swallow the most dupes, is that of a dehumanized killing machines, the only thing they do in Ireland is to enjoy killing native and non-stop abusing them, neither more nor less than that performed in the 40's in Hollywood on Nazis, and indeed, this film has much in common with the other hand, portentous Hangmen Also Die, the (yes) master Fritz Lang. True, in the classic Austrian director had didacticism, and a clear good and bad, with that Brecht's own intellectualism that was something cold and hard to grasp by the viewer Loach likes both, but lacking the force of another, and, above all, moral debate that has been submitted to Brian Donlevy, between doing the right thing and surrender to the Nazis, while here the creation of Cillian Murphy is a hero in the Homeric sense of the word, strong and without weaknesses to fight the evil giants attacking people. And, in The Wind That Shakes the Barley not no room for debate, English destroys any attempt of reflection by the viewer and makes him swallow his message, it really dangerous to justify the fact, so quite explicit, the use of violence, leading to sympathize with the IRA, something similar to what made the cake in his allegedly inflammatory Medem The Basque Ball . There were more ideas, a priori, more interesting, such as dehumanization caused by the war on people, or the inability to mix law and war, but that does not matter at the point where they'll become the film, a parody of children looking for small to eat the head and left wing people here see the classic songs mythologized to the ridicule of a struggle based on ideals quite correct, but where the end should never justify the means and to see supported its political and sign that the festival is happening something strange and it looks all that is removing political consciences ... mine, of course, to forget, is that I am an evil mataboers
Friday, September 24, 2010
Between Love And Goodbye
[REC]: Terror hyper
a kid my family used to go every weekend to a cottage which my own grandparents. The classic old country house with some look really creepy and disturbing if you have an age apt to dream of monsters under the bed and ghosts of those noise-making blood-curdling you lids as you sheets to the head, regardless of the time of year. Among the innocent games I had with my cousins \u200b\u200bwere coming up to the second floor, where no one slept and whose bedrooms were used as store for old clothes and various utensils, and, seen from outside, scared, because, from time to time appeared some light on or the windows were open without, apparently, no one would. We were three or four children as young as eight or nine years climbing the stairs that diverged into two paths leading to doors. That brief moment on the stairs was the basic idea of \u200b\u200bpanic, looking up and seeing the doors seemed to open, once inside, not go out. That is, cinematically, stair climbing detective Arbogast in Psycho , slow and fraught with tension. Once there, trying to pass the as long as possible while our heart was going a mile a minute and the house seemed to groan, more a product of our suggestion that the furniture might be interested in scare. In the midst of darkness, not knowing whether that to what you topabas was a bed, or arm of a monster that went around, not knowing if the noise we heard was that of a pipe or a ghost that moved slowly us, tension and fear that we experienced was crescendo as we went into the darkness, until suddenly one came running and the others were still screaming in terror from the old stays until we saw a ray of light through the door ajar and went back to the family room safe. What I felt at that moment was pure terror, horror, fear suffocating in its purest conception, that grips you and you can not shake off, that fear can experience almost exclusively children, those with the capacity to dream both for good and for bad. In the film, that feeling had only while a ball coming down the unoccupied second floor the stairs hit like a hammer and a distressed and incredulous George C. Scott approached check it at the end of the ladder . Masterpieces of the genre or as or The Shining Seed the devil made me experience the feeling of fear, a fear that dominates you and leaves you immobile. With [REC] went back to that second floor, that impenetrable darkness, I again have nine years and think that under my bed might have something grabbed my foot in the middle of the night and dragged me with him.
tape not intended as a thesis, however much it is dressed in television documentary of those who may be on stale programs for the elderly such as Spain Direct is not intended as a tart critique of the television and flip through the morbid and unhealthy despite the famous "Do not stop recording with Angela tells camera, as if they pursue the shift Jesulín to ask about her great-aunt angina, anything can be interesting and then broadcast it even though everything was working around the nondescript two-night fire. A film that seeks to, almost exclusively, the pure entertainment of the viewer, let them go wrong based on something less than an hour and a half frantic and terrible in eighty minutes in which every action seems to be improvised by the ability of two directors who demonstrate a superlative command of film language, bringing terror to some heights to which until now had not been approached about being real as life itself, and may be the seed of a hybrid genre between the most suffocating terror and pure neo-realism, a genre where every drop of sweat and blood were hyperreal, where every gasp had been caused by a tangible terror, and where the suspense was in what can not be controlled, that inexplicable, going off the tangent of dark rooms, dramatic effects created by the sound, hands that rest on the shoulders of the players scared in the dark. Experimentation in a genre devoted to repeating the same clichés and five or six changes such topics from a peripheral to the American cinema (Asia in recent years), only to fall again in a loop, something that is never seen. Balagueró Plaza and have the freedom and unpredictability his big gun, placing his characters as real as the fear, in a controlled but seemingly more insecure at the same time, since we all fear that unknown, and this is usually always closer to what we have and that, therefore, less hope to change. A simple script with no traps nuisance to place characters in situations insurmountable, and profiled characters brilliant and consistent, with some surprising touches of humor that helps make everything more bearable, and the exercise of more virtuous and surprising direction in 2007 next to Zack Snyder in 300 , they take the film to a higher level the horror genre, making it a rare bird that mixture as little violence, suspense and action, and lead the viewer into a finale, showing the control their own competent film directors, and where, almost plagiarizing in his brilliant Fresnadillo 28 Weeks Later, and Demme in The Silence of the Lambs make night vision the best way to create a sense of confusion and fear with only guess the shapes, playing with the idea of \u200b\u200bfear caused by the unknown and what we can only feel. Plaza Balagueró and sign the best film their respective filmographies and gender in many years, and demonstrating to the rest of mediocre and English filmmakers weeping for a film that is good do not need a big budget, if not good ideas and work within what you have. As a child playing on a voluntary basis to be scared. Now I pay in a film to scare me ... yes, the difference is that now I get with someone who is nine.
a kid my family used to go every weekend to a cottage which my own grandparents. The classic old country house with some look really creepy and disturbing if you have an age apt to dream of monsters under the bed and ghosts of those noise-making blood-curdling you lids as you sheets to the head, regardless of the time of year. Among the innocent games I had with my cousins \u200b\u200bwere coming up to the second floor, where no one slept and whose bedrooms were used as store for old clothes and various utensils, and, seen from outside, scared, because, from time to time appeared some light on or the windows were open without, apparently, no one would. We were three or four children as young as eight or nine years climbing the stairs that diverged into two paths leading to doors. That brief moment on the stairs was the basic idea of \u200b\u200bpanic, looking up and seeing the doors seemed to open, once inside, not go out. That is, cinematically, stair climbing detective Arbogast in Psycho , slow and fraught with tension. Once there, trying to pass the as long as possible while our heart was going a mile a minute and the house seemed to groan, more a product of our suggestion that the furniture might be interested in scare. In the midst of darkness, not knowing whether that to what you topabas was a bed, or arm of a monster that went around, not knowing if the noise we heard was that of a pipe or a ghost that moved slowly us, tension and fear that we experienced was crescendo as we went into the darkness, until suddenly one came running and the others were still screaming in terror from the old stays until we saw a ray of light through the door ajar and went back to the family room safe. What I felt at that moment was pure terror, horror, fear suffocating in its purest conception, that grips you and you can not shake off, that fear can experience almost exclusively children, those with the capacity to dream both for good and for bad. In the film, that feeling had only while a ball coming down the unoccupied second floor the stairs hit like a hammer and a distressed and incredulous George C. Scott approached check it at the end of the ladder . Masterpieces of the genre or as or The Shining Seed the devil made me experience the feeling of fear, a fear that dominates you and leaves you immobile. With [REC] went back to that second floor, that impenetrable darkness, I again have nine years and think that under my bed might have something grabbed my foot in the middle of the night and dragged me with him.
tape not intended as a thesis, however much it is dressed in television documentary of those who may be on stale programs for the elderly such as Spain Direct is not intended as a tart critique of the television and flip through the morbid and unhealthy despite the famous "Do not stop recording with Angela tells camera, as if they pursue the shift Jesulín to ask about her great-aunt angina, anything can be interesting and then broadcast it even though everything was working around the nondescript two-night fire. A film that seeks to, almost exclusively, the pure entertainment of the viewer, let them go wrong based on something less than an hour and a half frantic and terrible in eighty minutes in which every action seems to be improvised by the ability of two directors who demonstrate a superlative command of film language, bringing terror to some heights to which until now had not been approached about being real as life itself, and may be the seed of a hybrid genre between the most suffocating terror and pure neo-realism, a genre where every drop of sweat and blood were hyperreal, where every gasp had been caused by a tangible terror, and where the suspense was in what can not be controlled, that inexplicable, going off the tangent of dark rooms, dramatic effects created by the sound, hands that rest on the shoulders of the players scared in the dark. Experimentation in a genre devoted to repeating the same clichés and five or six changes such topics from a peripheral to the American cinema (Asia in recent years), only to fall again in a loop, something that is never seen. Balagueró Plaza and have the freedom and unpredictability his big gun, placing his characters as real as the fear, in a controlled but seemingly more insecure at the same time, since we all fear that unknown, and this is usually always closer to what we have and that, therefore, less hope to change. A simple script with no traps nuisance to place characters in situations insurmountable, and profiled characters brilliant and consistent, with some surprising touches of humor that helps make everything more bearable, and the exercise of more virtuous and surprising direction in 2007 next to Zack Snyder in 300 , they take the film to a higher level the horror genre, making it a rare bird that mixture as little violence, suspense and action, and lead the viewer into a finale, showing the control their own competent film directors, and where, almost plagiarizing in his brilliant Fresnadillo 28 Weeks Later, and Demme in The Silence of the Lambs make night vision the best way to create a sense of confusion and fear with only guess the shapes, playing with the idea of \u200b\u200bfear caused by the unknown and what we can only feel. Plaza Balagueró and sign the best film their respective filmographies and gender in many years, and demonstrating to the rest of mediocre and English filmmakers weeping for a film that is good do not need a big budget, if not good ideas and work within what you have. As a child playing on a voluntary basis to be scared. Now I pay in a film to scare me ... yes, the difference is that now I get with someone who is nine.
Monday, June 14, 2010
What Kind Of Hair Does Teyana Taylor Have
Kagemusha: The Emperor's New Clothes
ORIGINAL TITLE Kagemusha
YEAR 1980 DURATION 159 min. Trailers / Videos
COUNTRY DIRECTOR
Japan Akira Kurosawa Akira Kurosawa &
SCRIPT Masato Ide
Shinichiro Ikebe
MUSIC PHOTOGRAPHY & Takao Saito Masaharu Ueda Tatsuya Nakadai
CAST, Tsutomu Yamazaki, Kenichi Hagiwara, Daisuke Ryu, Masayuki Yui, Toshihiko Shimizu
is very depressing to have to talk about the difficulty they had the great geniuses the history of cinema to create new jobs to advanced ages, which for many meant the death in life. It's something that Billy Wilder commented in his interview with Cameron Crowe, and said he did not trust in experienced hands, but it is preferred to leave a project of many millions in the hands of new directors that would benefit the box office, and many suffered . People like Ford, Hawks, Hitchcock and Wilder himself ended their lives begging for one last movie that always denied, especially if the bleeding was the Austrian master, who lived 20 years without having had the opportunity to get behind the scenes and show that when the truth fat cats are those handling the issue of how best, and not only that, but it was as genuine mediocre remake one of his tapes, Sabrina , shamelessly. Given this it is no wonder the deep depression that engulfed Akira Kurosawa, perhaps, one of five or six more monstrous and talented directors, whose importance in the history of cinema is like the scientist who described a new priest, seeing that a few years after winning the Oscar with the grim Dersu Uzala, could not find who you pay a new movie. Fortunately (or unfortunately, get to know you), Lucas and Coppola appeared and Kagemusha financed, the film that definitely causes a split in his films and has his fervent Occidentalism to a point never before reached, trying to turn an idea into something so Japanese worldwide reach, which means that, despite being a work of great depth aesthetic, whose visual beauty is undeniable, is irregular and can not be the place to meet your great bands, but without However, it can be seen as a preview of his last great masterpiece, it was awesome Shakespearian fresh Ran, which could tack better aesthetics and history here not to make it unbalanced, as is the case The Shadow Warrior , somewhat marred by the density of the staging of Kurosawa and quite incomprehensible in many parts, in addition to the concessions to the Western public, especially in the songs, away from his work at Toho.
And that spirit is the first Kurosawa is hard to see here. We are facing a more pessimistic filmmaker with a message, Sometimes an excessive badness, and wallows in the cruelty of life, erasing the image Capriana leaving the monumental genius Ikiru, song to life with the great Takashi Shimura. Here the light at the end of the tunnel no longer exists, backtracking is not seen as a choice and destiny we mark from the same crib, well seen the example of Shingen's grandson, and the epic is linked to a dark path, since that there is no adventure, the battles are a sign of mental strength and iconic, as represented by the spirit of the leader Takeda and image embodied in the face of his double Kagemusha. Kurosawa, as in the celebrated case of Spielberg, Lucas and The Temple of Doom , seems to convey all the evil that the world has given him all the hypocrisy, and turn this tragedy into an elegiac film that is slowly dying, but not in a pejorative sense, if not that, as in to Once Upon a Time, we see an absolute requiem, the summary of all that spirituality that has always inhabited the Japanese master's films, from Rashomon to Barbarossa, up to a grim epilogue filled with rage, with a depth worthy praise, since, even though their characters do not have any psychological depth, but it is a mere revision of virtues or defects hardly evolve throughout the film, all at full power, opening a range intimate and psychological line of David Lean has already sensed with Dersu Uzala , but nevertheless, this did have the taste of old filmmaker Yojimbo, Sanjuro or Seven Samurai, wonderful arguments in favor of popular movies and evasion. In contrast, the narrative line causes boredom at some time or another, and its density for the most disadvantaged, as Kurosawa over losing that time was full of vitality and style that narrative clarity to stop and turn his film into something slow even cumbersome, what you can do that by promoting the virtues intimate, smother the narrative and make the viewer not only be lost in history, if not lose interest in the film, as the battle sequence in which the power of the Takeda clan leader is tested in assault on the castle and win the fight for their presence, planned so that we never know for sure what happens, and you finish highlighting the visual appearance over the story (such as the spectacular use of the dream sequence in which Kagemusha, copy of the original feared retaliation, Shingen, once it was stopped stealing) when the director was characterized by transparency narrative of his films, leading him to be compared with the larger among the greats, John Ford, allowing the viewer a glimpse of the disillusionment with the Japanese film giant now contemplating life.
Here, despite being based on a true story happened in the endless civil wars between the clans Japanese cinema has always portrayed Japan, and that saves a lot of resemblance to the famous victory of the troops of the Cid in Valencia with the body of this on horseback, the director of Stray Dog brings all the power of Shakespearean literature and builds a drama in which, like the English genius, it attacks the megalomania displayed in Katsuyori, son of the lord, who seeks usurp, by way of Richard III, the throne, prevented his own son, a true heir appointed by Shingen. Within this figure, masterfully described by the pen the script and even better portrayed by the skill of the director in a couple of sequences, we find everything that has always caused the largest declines: ambition. Following this rule, which almost always true, that everything that goes up must come down, Kurosawa exemplifies a perfect portrait of irrationality, as opposed to the ideas that he had passed the wise Shingen. It is especially clarifying the scene in which the child talks to his counselor and this tells him that her late father prevents you from using its emblem mountain, and the magical and terrifying final battle sequence everything is explained why. Immaturity is something hard to cure, and here is the example. As a result, we find another of the strengths of the film, reflection and analysis about the power and everything that entails, the devastation and futility, sometimes it all, and the dangers involved the failure of a ruler. Following these designs of Machiavelli who spoke about good leader, Shingen is presented as a cunning and powerful warlord, perhaps cruel but intelligent and wise and well advised. It is important to the group surrounding the head visible, and counselors can move more than a real king (and that the English know better than anyone that we bundled the mentees in the Baroque was tremendous), and is ignoring the thoughtless Katsuyori, which acts angered by pride and the arrogance of having the largest army in its favor, not to mention that the theme of the four elements is what made America great was her father, can be interpreted as a democratic argument director, if it is true that Kurosawa little or no After talking about facts that were not pertaining to the condition and form of human being. In contrast, the development of Kagemusha is rather weak, and much is wasted that could be the portrait make your search for identity and loss of life to live a lie, because the story focuses more on the areas of power and greed in the real protagonist of her, which ends consumed with his own legend the final battle, after which killed the soul, the container matter rather little, and drifting in the misty and spooky Lake Suwa, thus fulfilling the dictates of fate, and only been postponed while the loyal and kind Nobukado , guide for a masked man who never felt comfortable with his new suit, saved him from being crucified for stealing.
ORIGINAL TITLE Kagemusha
YEAR 1980 DURATION 159 min. Trailers / Videos
COUNTRY DIRECTOR
Japan Akira Kurosawa Akira Kurosawa &
SCRIPT Masato Ide
Shinichiro Ikebe
MUSIC PHOTOGRAPHY & Takao Saito Masaharu Ueda Tatsuya Nakadai
CAST, Tsutomu Yamazaki, Kenichi Hagiwara, Daisuke Ryu, Masayuki Yui, Toshihiko Shimizu
is very depressing to have to talk about the difficulty they had the great geniuses the history of cinema to create new jobs to advanced ages, which for many meant the death in life. It's something that Billy Wilder commented in his interview with Cameron Crowe, and said he did not trust in experienced hands, but it is preferred to leave a project of many millions in the hands of new directors that would benefit the box office, and many suffered . People like Ford, Hawks, Hitchcock and Wilder himself ended their lives begging for one last movie that always denied, especially if the bleeding was the Austrian master, who lived 20 years without having had the opportunity to get behind the scenes and show that when the truth fat cats are those handling the issue of how best, and not only that, but it was as genuine mediocre remake one of his tapes, Sabrina , shamelessly. Given this it is no wonder the deep depression that engulfed Akira Kurosawa, perhaps, one of five or six more monstrous and talented directors, whose importance in the history of cinema is like the scientist who described a new priest, seeing that a few years after winning the Oscar with the grim Dersu Uzala, could not find who you pay a new movie. Fortunately (or unfortunately, get to know you), Lucas and Coppola appeared and Kagemusha financed, the film that definitely causes a split in his films and has his fervent Occidentalism to a point never before reached, trying to turn an idea into something so Japanese worldwide reach, which means that, despite being a work of great depth aesthetic, whose visual beauty is undeniable, is irregular and can not be the place to meet your great bands, but without However, it can be seen as a preview of his last great masterpiece, it was awesome Shakespearian fresh Ran, which could tack better aesthetics and history here not to make it unbalanced, as is the case The Shadow Warrior , somewhat marred by the density of the staging of Kurosawa and quite incomprehensible in many parts, in addition to the concessions to the Western public, especially in the songs, away from his work at Toho.
And that spirit is the first Kurosawa is hard to see here. We are facing a more pessimistic filmmaker with a message, Sometimes an excessive badness, and wallows in the cruelty of life, erasing the image Capriana leaving the monumental genius Ikiru, song to life with the great Takashi Shimura. Here the light at the end of the tunnel no longer exists, backtracking is not seen as a choice and destiny we mark from the same crib, well seen the example of Shingen's grandson, and the epic is linked to a dark path, since that there is no adventure, the battles are a sign of mental strength and iconic, as represented by the spirit of the leader Takeda and image embodied in the face of his double Kagemusha. Kurosawa, as in the celebrated case of Spielberg, Lucas and The Temple of Doom , seems to convey all the evil that the world has given him all the hypocrisy, and turn this tragedy into an elegiac film that is slowly dying, but not in a pejorative sense, if not that, as in to Once Upon a Time, we see an absolute requiem, the summary of all that spirituality that has always inhabited the Japanese master's films, from Rashomon to Barbarossa, up to a grim epilogue filled with rage, with a depth worthy praise, since, even though their characters do not have any psychological depth, but it is a mere revision of virtues or defects hardly evolve throughout the film, all at full power, opening a range intimate and psychological line of David Lean has already sensed with Dersu Uzala , but nevertheless, this did have the taste of old filmmaker Yojimbo, Sanjuro or Seven Samurai, wonderful arguments in favor of popular movies and evasion. In contrast, the narrative line causes boredom at some time or another, and its density for the most disadvantaged, as Kurosawa over losing that time was full of vitality and style that narrative clarity to stop and turn his film into something slow even cumbersome, what you can do that by promoting the virtues intimate, smother the narrative and make the viewer not only be lost in history, if not lose interest in the film, as the battle sequence in which the power of the Takeda clan leader is tested in assault on the castle and win the fight for their presence, planned so that we never know for sure what happens, and you finish highlighting the visual appearance over the story (such as the spectacular use of the dream sequence in which Kagemusha, copy of the original feared retaliation, Shingen, once it was stopped stealing) when the director was characterized by transparency narrative of his films, leading him to be compared with the larger among the greats, John Ford, allowing the viewer a glimpse of the disillusionment with the Japanese film giant now contemplating life.
Here, despite being based on a true story happened in the endless civil wars between the clans Japanese cinema has always portrayed Japan, and that saves a lot of resemblance to the famous victory of the troops of the Cid in Valencia with the body of this on horseback, the director of Stray Dog brings all the power of Shakespearean literature and builds a drama in which, like the English genius, it attacks the megalomania displayed in Katsuyori, son of the lord, who seeks usurp, by way of Richard III, the throne, prevented his own son, a true heir appointed by Shingen. Within this figure, masterfully described by the pen the script and even better portrayed by the skill of the director in a couple of sequences, we find everything that has always caused the largest declines: ambition. Following this rule, which almost always true, that everything that goes up must come down, Kurosawa exemplifies a perfect portrait of irrationality, as opposed to the ideas that he had passed the wise Shingen. It is especially clarifying the scene in which the child talks to his counselor and this tells him that her late father prevents you from using its emblem mountain, and the magical and terrifying final battle sequence everything is explained why. Immaturity is something hard to cure, and here is the example. As a result, we find another of the strengths of the film, reflection and analysis about the power and everything that entails, the devastation and futility, sometimes it all, and the dangers involved the failure of a ruler. Following these designs of Machiavelli who spoke about good leader, Shingen is presented as a cunning and powerful warlord, perhaps cruel but intelligent and wise and well advised. It is important to the group surrounding the head visible, and counselors can move more than a real king (and that the English know better than anyone that we bundled the mentees in the Baroque was tremendous), and is ignoring the thoughtless Katsuyori, which acts angered by pride and the arrogance of having the largest army in its favor, not to mention that the theme of the four elements is what made America great was her father, can be interpreted as a democratic argument director, if it is true that Kurosawa little or no After talking about facts that were not pertaining to the condition and form of human being. In contrast, the development of Kagemusha is rather weak, and much is wasted that could be the portrait make your search for identity and loss of life to live a lie, because the story focuses more on the areas of power and greed in the real protagonist of her, which ends consumed with his own legend the final battle, after which killed the soul, the container matter rather little, and drifting in the misty and spooky Lake Suwa, thus fulfilling the dictates of fate, and only been postponed while the loyal and kind Nobukado , guide for a masked man who never felt comfortable with his new suit, saved him from being crucified for stealing.
Sunday, May 30, 2010
Doushinji Palletshipping
CRAZY the birth of the Messiah pop
ORIGINAL TITLE
CRAZY (CRAZY)
YEAR 2005 DURATION 127 min. Canada
COUNTRY DIRECTOR Jean-Marc Vallée Jean-Marc
SCRIPT Vallée, François Boulay
Several
MUSIC PHOTO SHARING Pierre Mignot
Michel Côté, Danielle Proulx, Marc-André Grondin, Émile Vallée
PRODUCER Cirrus Communications / Crazy Films Jean
Marc Vallée, debutant director, surprised and strangers performing one of the most renowned films in 2005 with CRAZY swept the awards of the Canadian film and spend a significant amount earned in the international market also to be unanimously praised by critics, coming to be regarded as the revelation of the season movie. It tells the relationship of Zac, a special child since birth, who possesses a kind of healing gift and a special sensitivity to his family, especially her father, a homophobe frightened by the idea that your child may be homosexual. As a curiosity, and matching the title of the song that marks the protagonist's relationship with his father (Crazy, Patsy Cline), the name of the movie is an acronym that contains the first letter of the name of Zac and his own Brothers in the respective order of birth: C hristian, R Aymond ntonine A, Z ac e And van.
generational change since Nicholas Ray
revolutionize the cinema in 1955 (along with Rossellini's Viaggio in Italia which pledged his life on screen played by the always excellent George Sanders) with the premiere of Rebel Without cause, envejecidísima film chronicling the experiences of an outsider unable to adapt to the American way of life of the 50's, we have seen thousands of times in movies the eternal parent-child conflict, the destruction of the bonding involved belong to two different worlds marked simply by the difference old. Provided, of course, located in adolescence, perhaps the most contentious stage in the life of a person, where you decide what kind of social member will be. In CRAZY , Vallée presents an interesting if uneven cool Canadian company called Quiet Revolution, when Quebec was carried out a drastic decline of religious influence in society. A country that changed in a rush and that topics about yourself social identity, cultural and religious. Beaulieu family, a figure somewhat Fordist group for their social function (and metonymy) for Canada, is always present and we will serve as a guide and introduction into the world apparently unknown to non-Canadian viewers. Subtle ways, using Christmas as a leitmotiv, placing the birth of the young Zac such an important day in the West and is on 24 December, we have cast the first goal. From that moment, the star symbolize an entire country, or rather, an entire generation that needed (and brought) the change.
Music is the soul of this generational change. The powerful soundtrack is used in an exemplary way to narrate a period of 20 years in the life of this particular family. A bit like Martin Scorsese, who has always used music to propose temporary jumps ellipsis and distinction. We found three very different phases: childhood, security, under the command and the parental control, in which we listen to Patsy Cline, Buddy Rich, Charles Aznavour, music that, to this day (and the 60 full revolution in pop as well), could be considered "old." A time full of poetic moments like those car rides with his head out, chips, holiday gifts, and other less pleasant, and small blame or the boring masses. But the house is a safe place (where for you, be ladybug is just something that should not be, without knowing the reality of the term), so when of child wets the bed, her mother runs to their aid soon, and when you go to camp, the children will drown by being unable to control. Patriarchy is always present on the players, the strong presence of paterfamilias comes out from that Zac has a word. The concerns of this for your child's sexuality, favoritism of this until it begins to emerge the "sensitivity" of Zac, these holidays are marked by the karaoke that is mounted Aznavour playing father (always a popular request, as jokes Gervais). Especially significant is the "sacrifice" of the protagonist to break the record of Patsy Cline will cause a schism with the father. He, thinking that will solve it, gives his father the same disk but in the Canadian edition, trying to correct the error, but for the father, even with the same songs, the same letters, "does not sound the same." Zac is that record that his father did not want to hear.
Later, in the seventies, when the son has decided to dethrone god belief to put rock stars in the altar, Bowie, Pink Floyd or the Stones take the soundtrack. Traditional iconography is cracking and replaced by secular deities, just as in the Mass, Psalms Zac does not listen, if not a choral version of Sympathy for the Devil. Birth of the Counterculture, Dies convention. This version teen decorate their bedroom (he now shares with his new little brother) and his own world, with patterns reminiscent of the masterful cover Dark Side of the Moon Pink Floyd and pictures of David Bowie, the new god previously referred to. A world away in her home, and to highlight that, at any given time we see him singing Space Oddity , whose lyrics have some resemblance to their adolescent feelings. And once that Zac's character seems to have matured, having left behind his homosexuality, but at the same time with his family dead, punk and electronic music are displayed as a symbol of the maturity of rupture, as was said movement within the rock. Although like everything in that time, illustrating the time of confusion and self-destruction of the main character, its identity lost in a constantly changing musical tastes, social and even their own aesthetic. The total rejection of the family and the rules imposed. Zac now seems a kind of Sid Vicious goes around and goes to her ball. Although here we have a little time Magdalena de Proust at the wedding of eldest brother. When Zac's cousin appears with her boyfriend, dancer attracts Zac, hear Brother Louie Stories before it, as in the 70, everything is broken and the problems teens about homosexuality out again.
The reverse in the mirror
CRAZY talk about identity, either a country or a person. And is the point around which everything revolves, using, as I have said, the music. But the final aspect that helps to shape (and destroy, all at the same time) Zac's personality is the presence of religion in his life, the assimilation of either dogmatic values \u200b\u200bencoded within the Christian tradition to end away from the official version end up being a simple matter of faith, man with God without church involved. The film is full of biblical references, as the ratio of Zac Cain and Raymond, "my greatest enemy ", but the most important refers to the messianic qualities of the protagonist. Because Zac is a character counter. Zac has asthma, but smoke. Zac does not believe in God, but prays. Zac is gay but sleeps with women by mere appearance. We reemphasize the drawing room Zac: the cover of Dark Side of the Moon , and beside it, a mirror in which we see the true face of our anti-hero. We as viewers we are only that we are aware of that omniscient view, because the boy's personality is extremely multifaceted, changing depending on who you are. But perhaps I should say the apparent real face, because if something leaves the film is free to interpretation. Hence the comparison to Jesus is quite accurate. As shown in the aforementioned scene of Patsy Cline album. We are never told it was him, but Zac takes the blame because it is their mission, the mission of the messiah of the Beaulieu family. Roasted like family to heal all because his mother asked. Therefore, to get the family is at peace, chooses to waive its condition creates a make-e (like Bowie) to be who is not. All for the family benefit, the father's joy. And in fact, that is, when the Christmas dinner for 80 runs in total harmony with father and son together as never before appearing again the issue of homosexuality. Thus, together with the fatal destiny of the wayward brother, this is a character set for a denouement worthy of the purest Greek tragedy. It's a shame that the movie madness and end up as a psychotropic trip to the back of your mind, because the idea of \u200b\u200bJerusalem with the lover almost identical to our standard vision of Jesus Christ, is not all bad, but too much dream time and conjunctions and miraculous coincidences subtracted more they bring, and are somewhat tiresome, as they repeat the same idea over on sensory and telepathic connection between mother and child, and we say, are somewhat ridiculous.
CRAZY
But despite its virtues, is irregular. No longer the indie film classic with all their tics and foibles clearly marked, from aesthetic abuse ellipses and an overburdened forced use of music, always seeking the most beautiful possible at the expense of an asceticism which, at times, are the best film. That mannerism, the baroque visual destroy the dramatic force as obtained based on the family tradition in daily scenes. When you leave the camera Vallée stand and let those who speak are the wonderful actors, the film grows in surprising ways. Michel Coté as the overbearing father gives lessons interpretation, and the times when everything works smoothly at the moment we have priceless sequence. The scene in the bathroom where the couple talks about her son, shot in a single plane, is something close to magic, to the everyday trapped in a frame. That sobriety, joined the expressive use of colors and shapes give these segments calmer certain postmodern touches of melodrama of Douglas Sirk. But when Canadian filmmaker decides to strike at the table and say "this is signed by an author" thing gets out of hand. The redundancy of slow motion to highlight the seriousness of a scene, the search constanre epic drama and forced at the end, if you do not worsen outcome global. They usually coincide with the looks now inside Zac introspective and subjective view of the world, how he addresses the situation. As the antithesis of the bath scene is the Christmas dinner, and in the 80's. It's all going well, conventionally and smoothly, the Christian wedding reaffirms this traditionalism, until the outbreak of conflict situation and drugs and homosexuality represented Raymond and Zac respectively. An outstanding piece to that Vallée's not enough to put their players to play. He, like metteur en scene, has to make their mark. We must not go like a bull in a china shop to show the hardness y la gravedad de una situación, hay más opciones además de la cámara lenta y a la música reventando tímpanos. Pregúntenle a un tal Clint Eastwood.
CRAZY (CRAZY)
YEAR 2005 DURATION 127 min. Canada
COUNTRY DIRECTOR Jean-Marc Vallée Jean-Marc
SCRIPT Vallée, François Boulay
Several
MUSIC PHOTO SHARING Pierre Mignot
Michel Côté, Danielle Proulx, Marc-André Grondin, Émile Vallée
PRODUCER Cirrus Communications / Crazy Films Jean
Marc Vallée, debutant director, surprised and strangers performing one of the most renowned films in 2005 with CRAZY swept the awards of the Canadian film and spend a significant amount earned in the international market also to be unanimously praised by critics, coming to be regarded as the revelation of the season movie. It tells the relationship of Zac, a special child since birth, who possesses a kind of healing gift and a special sensitivity to his family, especially her father, a homophobe frightened by the idea that your child may be homosexual. As a curiosity, and matching the title of the song that marks the protagonist's relationship with his father (Crazy, Patsy Cline), the name of the movie is an acronym that contains the first letter of the name of Zac and his own Brothers in the respective order of birth: C hristian, R Aymond ntonine A, Z ac e And van.
generational change since Nicholas Ray
revolutionize the cinema in 1955 (along with Rossellini's Viaggio in Italia which pledged his life on screen played by the always excellent George Sanders) with the premiere of Rebel Without cause, envejecidísima film chronicling the experiences of an outsider unable to adapt to the American way of life of the 50's, we have seen thousands of times in movies the eternal parent-child conflict, the destruction of the bonding involved belong to two different worlds marked simply by the difference old. Provided, of course, located in adolescence, perhaps the most contentious stage in the life of a person, where you decide what kind of social member will be. In CRAZY , Vallée presents an interesting if uneven cool Canadian company called Quiet Revolution, when Quebec was carried out a drastic decline of religious influence in society. A country that changed in a rush and that topics about yourself social identity, cultural and religious. Beaulieu family, a figure somewhat Fordist group for their social function (and metonymy) for Canada, is always present and we will serve as a guide and introduction into the world apparently unknown to non-Canadian viewers. Subtle ways, using Christmas as a leitmotiv, placing the birth of the young Zac such an important day in the West and is on 24 December, we have cast the first goal. From that moment, the star symbolize an entire country, or rather, an entire generation that needed (and brought) the change.
Music is the soul of this generational change. The powerful soundtrack is used in an exemplary way to narrate a period of 20 years in the life of this particular family. A bit like Martin Scorsese, who has always used music to propose temporary jumps ellipsis and distinction. We found three very different phases: childhood, security, under the command and the parental control, in which we listen to Patsy Cline, Buddy Rich, Charles Aznavour, music that, to this day (and the 60 full revolution in pop as well), could be considered "old." A time full of poetic moments like those car rides with his head out, chips, holiday gifts, and other less pleasant, and small blame or the boring masses. But the house is a safe place (where for you, be ladybug is just something that should not be, without knowing the reality of the term), so when of child wets the bed, her mother runs to their aid soon, and when you go to camp, the children will drown by being unable to control. Patriarchy is always present on the players, the strong presence of paterfamilias comes out from that Zac has a word. The concerns of this for your child's sexuality, favoritism of this until it begins to emerge the "sensitivity" of Zac, these holidays are marked by the karaoke that is mounted Aznavour playing father (always a popular request, as jokes Gervais). Especially significant is the "sacrifice" of the protagonist to break the record of Patsy Cline will cause a schism with the father. He, thinking that will solve it, gives his father the same disk but in the Canadian edition, trying to correct the error, but for the father, even with the same songs, the same letters, "does not sound the same." Zac is that record that his father did not want to hear.
Later, in the seventies, when the son has decided to dethrone god belief to put rock stars in the altar, Bowie, Pink Floyd or the Stones take the soundtrack. Traditional iconography is cracking and replaced by secular deities, just as in the Mass, Psalms Zac does not listen, if not a choral version of Sympathy for the Devil. Birth of the Counterculture, Dies convention. This version teen decorate their bedroom (he now shares with his new little brother) and his own world, with patterns reminiscent of the masterful cover Dark Side of the Moon Pink Floyd and pictures of David Bowie, the new god previously referred to. A world away in her home, and to highlight that, at any given time we see him singing Space Oddity , whose lyrics have some resemblance to their adolescent feelings. And once that Zac's character seems to have matured, having left behind his homosexuality, but at the same time with his family dead, punk and electronic music are displayed as a symbol of the maturity of rupture, as was said movement within the rock. Although like everything in that time, illustrating the time of confusion and self-destruction of the main character, its identity lost in a constantly changing musical tastes, social and even their own aesthetic. The total rejection of the family and the rules imposed. Zac now seems a kind of Sid Vicious goes around and goes to her ball. Although here we have a little time Magdalena de Proust at the wedding of eldest brother. When Zac's cousin appears with her boyfriend, dancer attracts Zac, hear Brother Louie Stories before it, as in the 70, everything is broken and the problems teens about homosexuality out again.
The reverse in the mirror
CRAZY talk about identity, either a country or a person. And is the point around which everything revolves, using, as I have said, the music. But the final aspect that helps to shape (and destroy, all at the same time) Zac's personality is the presence of religion in his life, the assimilation of either dogmatic values \u200b\u200bencoded within the Christian tradition to end away from the official version end up being a simple matter of faith, man with God without church involved. The film is full of biblical references, as the ratio of Zac Cain and Raymond, "my greatest enemy ", but the most important refers to the messianic qualities of the protagonist. Because Zac is a character counter. Zac has asthma, but smoke. Zac does not believe in God, but prays. Zac is gay but sleeps with women by mere appearance. We reemphasize the drawing room Zac: the cover of Dark Side of the Moon , and beside it, a mirror in which we see the true face of our anti-hero. We as viewers we are only that we are aware of that omniscient view, because the boy's personality is extremely multifaceted, changing depending on who you are. But perhaps I should say the apparent real face, because if something leaves the film is free to interpretation. Hence the comparison to Jesus is quite accurate. As shown in the aforementioned scene of Patsy Cline album. We are never told it was him, but Zac takes the blame because it is their mission, the mission of the messiah of the Beaulieu family. Roasted like family to heal all because his mother asked. Therefore, to get the family is at peace, chooses to waive its condition creates a make-e (like Bowie) to be who is not. All for the family benefit, the father's joy. And in fact, that is, when the Christmas dinner for 80 runs in total harmony with father and son together as never before appearing again the issue of homosexuality. Thus, together with the fatal destiny of the wayward brother, this is a character set for a denouement worthy of the purest Greek tragedy. It's a shame that the movie madness and end up as a psychotropic trip to the back of your mind, because the idea of \u200b\u200bJerusalem with the lover almost identical to our standard vision of Jesus Christ, is not all bad, but too much dream time and conjunctions and miraculous coincidences subtracted more they bring, and are somewhat tiresome, as they repeat the same idea over on sensory and telepathic connection between mother and child, and we say, are somewhat ridiculous.
CRAZY
But despite its virtues, is irregular. No longer the indie film classic with all their tics and foibles clearly marked, from aesthetic abuse ellipses and an overburdened forced use of music, always seeking the most beautiful possible at the expense of an asceticism which, at times, are the best film. That mannerism, the baroque visual destroy the dramatic force as obtained based on the family tradition in daily scenes. When you leave the camera Vallée stand and let those who speak are the wonderful actors, the film grows in surprising ways. Michel Coté as the overbearing father gives lessons interpretation, and the times when everything works smoothly at the moment we have priceless sequence. The scene in the bathroom where the couple talks about her son, shot in a single plane, is something close to magic, to the everyday trapped in a frame. That sobriety, joined the expressive use of colors and shapes give these segments calmer certain postmodern touches of melodrama of Douglas Sirk. But when Canadian filmmaker decides to strike at the table and say "this is signed by an author" thing gets out of hand. The redundancy of slow motion to highlight the seriousness of a scene, the search constanre epic drama and forced at the end, if you do not worsen outcome global. They usually coincide with the looks now inside Zac introspective and subjective view of the world, how he addresses the situation. As the antithesis of the bath scene is the Christmas dinner, and in the 80's. It's all going well, conventionally and smoothly, the Christian wedding reaffirms this traditionalism, until the outbreak of conflict situation and drugs and homosexuality represented Raymond and Zac respectively. An outstanding piece to that Vallée's not enough to put their players to play. He, like metteur en scene, has to make their mark. We must not go like a bull in a china shop to show the hardness y la gravedad de una situación, hay más opciones además de la cámara lenta y a la música reventando tímpanos. Pregúntenle a un tal Clint Eastwood.
Saturday, May 29, 2010
Marriage Invitation Format In Tamil Kavithai
Cache: beyond the wall
TÍTULO ORIGINAL Caché
AÑO 2005
DURACIÓN 117 min.
PAÍS Austria
DIRECTOR Michael Haneke
GUIÓN Michael Haneke
MÚSICA
FOTOGRAFÍA Christian Berger
REPARTO Daniel Auteuil, Juliette Binoche, Maurice Bénichou, Annie Girardot, Lester Makedonsky, Bernard Le Coq, Walid Afkir, Daniel PRODUCER
Duval Co Austria-France-Germany-Italy, Wega Film / Les Films du Losange / Bavaria Film / BIM Distribuzione
'm the opposite of being a specialist in Haneke's films, I've only seen a few film credits ( pianist, Funny Games, 71 Fragments of a Chronology random and Benny's video) so I can not venture to speak of creative and authorial world beyond mere scraps that I could collect from their jobs, yes very particular, where there are an unhealthy taste for violence reminiscent of an even more explicit, Cronenberg, and a fairly little complacent human being, placing it as a vulgar bourgeois subject who is only out of self-contemplation by the bubble burst of violence and disease. The other day I read a definition on the movie more or less simple, it is still very successful and enlightening of what this art: the movies start when something breaks normal. However, Haneke seems to want to twist this reductionist approach and turn it over to make it the reality that breaks like a bull in a china shop in the reality in a free pair of mirrors. How is this possible? This recording with which they start the film, which shows a street in an unidentified location and, if not because suddenly the image is rewound and the voices of Juliette Binoche and Daniel Auteuil interrupted, we would take as the true beginning of a movie where, in short, is going to happen something related with the protagonists. And subtly tells us something that makes this pair of seemingly perfect bourgeois life (and boring): alter reality at will and way, if you do not like something change or treat with contempt (especially significant in this regard is the passage in which Georges is editing his TV and cut a large part to keep it "interesting"). Act with a bandage on their eyes to what happens in the world (George walks past the camera and not be aware of it) quite elitist, have the ability to decide what to discard and use it regardless. A cruel and cold way to live, but the one chosen by this pair of snobs and his son, make no doubt of the Internet generation. Owner of a tough-talking, in their irregularity of film, the strength and conviction with which he recounts the events (rather with stops on them) make it an experience that plays to take away the mask of a society like the current, more concerned with false appearances and good relationships that meet the real needs of the world, these are basic (the issue of racism in France is latent throughout the film).
filmmaker Hitchcock partially disguised (with touches of Bunuel) using a McGuffin to tell a suspenseful story with a dramatic background, ie, the tapes are worthless in the plot, is the spark that ignites the motor. The only thing that Haneke was looking for a justification for analyzing contemporary bourgeois society, especially in French (why are so obnoxious and pedantic, even dining lazy days?) Because, in an ending as disturbing as open, we are not clear At no time who the author of the recording and, of course, we give answers on what is planted, letting the viewer to scratch in the surface to draw conclusions. Moreover, the film, after the two planes that might be called the end of the protagonist sleeping in the shadows and memory, ends as it begins, that is, something cyclical, and we could be looking back to that mysterious being (almost demiurgic) capturing fragments Laurent's lives. The disturbing thought that the film is based directly targeted intellectuals immersed in a world not real, it works both on television (again, choose the reality you are interested in) as it (works in a literary publishing house, I have no to say) and son (pijito in his spare time goes swimming) are a microcosm undisturbed in the house. It is this detail of interest to Haneke, putting man in conflict with their fears and worries more accurate, the real, those who are never going to get left behind. Therefore Georges and Anne are indignant sovereign when police tell what the usual procedure of disappearance, or when she decides to hire a detective, to which he, in a cynical way too much, you Contet that "have seen many movies . Majid, a mysterious character, no longer the guilt that the protagonist is constantly to return to reality and will never abandon him. This is shown in a quite Dostoevsky, because this child now become a disturbing and almost ghostly memory does not differ much of the ghost that appears to Raskolnikov or the devil to Ivan Karamazov, or a tape that also drank from the literary sources of the Russian writer, the masterful work of Fritz Lang Scarlet . Interestingly, it has nothing in common with these works. At first you may feel identified with the protagonist, but when you see their behavior as a viewer you end up taking him even dislike. Georges also a liar, a bad son, and finally, and here is the grace of election Haneke, you may feel empathy for that initially presented as actant is threatening the environment of the protagonist.
In his last stick this social class, Haneke makes room for no ink left in the almost religious use of lies by the characters. In contrast to the shock that is facing reality, so often hidden by the bandage, the family uses deceit as a basic form of relating. From the outset this is a manipulated reality, where the father does not know what your son, since this hides it innocently. When a tape in the middle of dinner, he hides, he discovers who the blackmailer, he turns to hide. A string of lies that was created 40 years ago in the most despicable possible, again increasing to reach a point where that marriage is in question the very basis of their relationship, the need for trust as a way of understanding life with another person. Recalling the coda of Kubrick, Eyes Wide Shut , by the way that torture the character (and the viewer) jumping between reality and fiction, subtly, Haneke increases that feeling to make the untenable burden, since the child also decides to join the feast liar. Raised in a modern world, a mirror image of his father, with all the comforts of the world, capricious and spoiled, and self-absorbed in swimming, it has more to do with them to say goodbye to them before bed, just like that strange when your father is pick you up at school "when I have a little time." A family broken, dead and it receives its finishing touch. I do not know if it deliberately, but it is especially singular that Haneke shows the room completely naked except for the books, numbering in the dozens on the shelf, a large TV where news is always made (always serious) than ignore players locked in their bubble, and a large dining table where you give your friends, to give that image of being socially integrated and committed to the talks among intellectuals who lavished such people, all outside the praxis of life . Perhaps because of this, the director chooses to take some distance with respect to history, his choice of staging is cold, without close-ups and no real violence choreographed (suicide is chilling by the speed and surprise with which it occurs). With his usual radical minimalism very strong, let it all flow in the natural course (all natural things can be going at 24 frames per second) and are the actors (especially a superlative Auteuil) who bear the brunt of action. Finally, recalling Paul Thomas Anderson's uneven but interesting There Will Be Blood, chooses that moment to show that marks the later history of the three characters through a general level of almost 2 minutes for, as he says Majid's son Georges, knowing the punishment that is loaded with a person's life.
TÍTULO ORIGINAL Caché
AÑO 2005
DURACIÓN 117 min.
PAÍS Austria
DIRECTOR Michael Haneke
GUIÓN Michael Haneke
MÚSICA
FOTOGRAFÍA Christian Berger
REPARTO Daniel Auteuil, Juliette Binoche, Maurice Bénichou, Annie Girardot, Lester Makedonsky, Bernard Le Coq, Walid Afkir, Daniel PRODUCER
Duval Co Austria-France-Germany-Italy, Wega Film / Les Films du Losange / Bavaria Film / BIM Distribuzione
'm the opposite of being a specialist in Haneke's films, I've only seen a few film credits ( pianist, Funny Games, 71 Fragments of a Chronology random and Benny's video) so I can not venture to speak of creative and authorial world beyond mere scraps that I could collect from their jobs, yes very particular, where there are an unhealthy taste for violence reminiscent of an even more explicit, Cronenberg, and a fairly little complacent human being, placing it as a vulgar bourgeois subject who is only out of self-contemplation by the bubble burst of violence and disease. The other day I read a definition on the movie more or less simple, it is still very successful and enlightening of what this art: the movies start when something breaks normal. However, Haneke seems to want to twist this reductionist approach and turn it over to make it the reality that breaks like a bull in a china shop in the reality in a free pair of mirrors. How is this possible? This recording with which they start the film, which shows a street in an unidentified location and, if not because suddenly the image is rewound and the voices of Juliette Binoche and Daniel Auteuil interrupted, we would take as the true beginning of a movie where, in short, is going to happen something related with the protagonists. And subtly tells us something that makes this pair of seemingly perfect bourgeois life (and boring): alter reality at will and way, if you do not like something change or treat with contempt (especially significant in this regard is the passage in which Georges is editing his TV and cut a large part to keep it "interesting"). Act with a bandage on their eyes to what happens in the world (George walks past the camera and not be aware of it) quite elitist, have the ability to decide what to discard and use it regardless. A cruel and cold way to live, but the one chosen by this pair of snobs and his son, make no doubt of the Internet generation. Owner of a tough-talking, in their irregularity of film, the strength and conviction with which he recounts the events (rather with stops on them) make it an experience that plays to take away the mask of a society like the current, more concerned with false appearances and good relationships that meet the real needs of the world, these are basic (the issue of racism in France is latent throughout the film).
filmmaker Hitchcock partially disguised (with touches of Bunuel) using a McGuffin to tell a suspenseful story with a dramatic background, ie, the tapes are worthless in the plot, is the spark that ignites the motor. The only thing that Haneke was looking for a justification for analyzing contemporary bourgeois society, especially in French (why are so obnoxious and pedantic, even dining lazy days?) Because, in an ending as disturbing as open, we are not clear At no time who the author of the recording and, of course, we give answers on what is planted, letting the viewer to scratch in the surface to draw conclusions. Moreover, the film, after the two planes that might be called the end of the protagonist sleeping in the shadows and memory, ends as it begins, that is, something cyclical, and we could be looking back to that mysterious being (almost demiurgic) capturing fragments Laurent's lives. The disturbing thought that the film is based directly targeted intellectuals immersed in a world not real, it works both on television (again, choose the reality you are interested in) as it (works in a literary publishing house, I have no to say) and son (pijito in his spare time goes swimming) are a microcosm undisturbed in the house. It is this detail of interest to Haneke, putting man in conflict with their fears and worries more accurate, the real, those who are never going to get left behind. Therefore Georges and Anne are indignant sovereign when police tell what the usual procedure of disappearance, or when she decides to hire a detective, to which he, in a cynical way too much, you Contet that "have seen many movies . Majid, a mysterious character, no longer the guilt that the protagonist is constantly to return to reality and will never abandon him. This is shown in a quite Dostoevsky, because this child now become a disturbing and almost ghostly memory does not differ much of the ghost that appears to Raskolnikov or the devil to Ivan Karamazov, or a tape that also drank from the literary sources of the Russian writer, the masterful work of Fritz Lang Scarlet . Interestingly, it has nothing in common with these works. At first you may feel identified with the protagonist, but when you see their behavior as a viewer you end up taking him even dislike. Georges also a liar, a bad son, and finally, and here is the grace of election Haneke, you may feel empathy for that initially presented as actant is threatening the environment of the protagonist.
In his last stick this social class, Haneke makes room for no ink left in the almost religious use of lies by the characters. In contrast to the shock that is facing reality, so often hidden by the bandage, the family uses deceit as a basic form of relating. From the outset this is a manipulated reality, where the father does not know what your son, since this hides it innocently. When a tape in the middle of dinner, he hides, he discovers who the blackmailer, he turns to hide. A string of lies that was created 40 years ago in the most despicable possible, again increasing to reach a point where that marriage is in question the very basis of their relationship, the need for trust as a way of understanding life with another person. Recalling the coda of Kubrick, Eyes Wide Shut , by the way that torture the character (and the viewer) jumping between reality and fiction, subtly, Haneke increases that feeling to make the untenable burden, since the child also decides to join the feast liar. Raised in a modern world, a mirror image of his father, with all the comforts of the world, capricious and spoiled, and self-absorbed in swimming, it has more to do with them to say goodbye to them before bed, just like that strange when your father is pick you up at school "when I have a little time." A family broken, dead and it receives its finishing touch. I do not know if it deliberately, but it is especially singular that Haneke shows the room completely naked except for the books, numbering in the dozens on the shelf, a large TV where news is always made (always serious) than ignore players locked in their bubble, and a large dining table where you give your friends, to give that image of being socially integrated and committed to the talks among intellectuals who lavished such people, all outside the praxis of life . Perhaps because of this, the director chooses to take some distance with respect to history, his choice of staging is cold, without close-ups and no real violence choreographed (suicide is chilling by the speed and surprise with which it occurs). With his usual radical minimalism very strong, let it all flow in the natural course (all natural things can be going at 24 frames per second) and are the actors (especially a superlative Auteuil) who bear the brunt of action. Finally, recalling Paul Thomas Anderson's uneven but interesting There Will Be Blood, chooses that moment to show that marks the later history of the three characters through a general level of almost 2 minutes for, as he says Majid's son Georges, knowing the punishment that is loaded with a person's life.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)